Saturday, 24/10/2026 at 16:00
Full timeLincoln City 4:1 Burnley
Lincoln City were the model's likeliest winner before kick-off at 36%. They won 4–1. The biggest difference was Burnley's attack: 2.35 xG against 1.25 projected (+1.10). Lincoln City produced 1.90 xG against 1.32 projected (+0.58).
Goals
- 39' Andreas Hountondji Burnley · 0.96 xG chance 0–1
- 45' Ben House Lincoln City · 0.55 xG chance 1–1
- 49' Mikkel Ladefoged Lincoln City · 0.13 xG chance 2–1
- 57' Dom Jefferies Lincoln City · 0.06 xG chance 3–1
- 67' Mikkel Ladefoged Lincoln City · 0.26 xG chance 4–1
The model against the result
- Lincoln City
- 36% What happened
- Draw
- 31%
- Burnley
- 33%
Data coverage Both teams have at least 10 matches in the model window, but at least one has fewer than the full 20.
Projected vs produced
Burnley produced 1.10 xG more than projected
Projected before kick-off Produced on the night
The shots behind it
- Shots
- 21
- 8
- On target
- 7
- 4
- Inside the box
- 12
- 7
- xG per shot
- 0.09
- 0.30
- Open play xG
- 0.96
- 0.53
- Set-piece xG
- 1.01
- 1.08
- Penalties
- 0
- 1
Lincoln City's shots add up to 1.97 xG and Burnley's to 2.43; the published figures are 1.90 and 2.35.
Shot map
Both teams shown attacking the same goal for comparison.
All shots
29 shots · 4.39 xG
Hover or tap a shot, or step through them with the arrows.
- Lincoln City
- Burnley
- Filled = goal
- Dot area = xG (the smallest chances drawn at a minimum size)
Recent form
0.96 xG created 1.46 xGA
- W 0.66 created, 0.58 conceded against Preston North End
- W 0.53 created, 1.53 conceded against Bristol City
- L 2.11 created, 0.92 conceded against Swansea City
- L 1.39 created, 0.68 conceded against Sheffield United
- L 0.35 created, 3.20 conceded against West Ham United
- D 0.73 created, 1.84 conceded against Millwall
1.28 xG created 1.72 xGA
- D 1.50 created, 1.35 conceded against Wrexham
- L 1.73 created, 2.63 conceded against Swansea City
- D 0.45 created, 1.75 conceded against Derby County
- W 1.94 created, 0.64 conceded against Watford
- D 1.08 created, 2.13 conceded against Charlton Athletic
- L 1.00 created, 1.82 conceded against Wolverhampton
xG created xG conceded (xGA) W / D / L: the match result
Pre-match model & market record
2 qualified edges flagged1 won1 lost
- Lost
- Won
View pre-match record Hide pre-match record
| Selection | Price | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Draw | 3.40 | +6.3% | Lost |
| Burnley at most 1 goal | 1.57 | +0.1% | Won |
Pre-match model vs market
| Outcome | Model | Market | Difference | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln City | 36.0% | 35.1% | +1.0 pp | 2.78 |
| Draw | 31.3% | 27.8% | +3.4 pp | 3.20 |
| Burnley | 32.7% | 37.1% | −4.4 pp | 3.06 |
Other markets
| Outcome | Model | Market | Difference | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln City to score | 75.9% | 73.1% | +2.8 pp | 1.32 |
| Lincoln City not to score | 24.1% | 26.9% | −2.8 pp | 4.16 |
| Burnley to score | 74.3% | 75.0% | −0.7 pp | 1.35 |
| Burnley not to score | 25.7% | 25.0% | +0.7 pp | 3.89 |
| Both teams to score | 58.3% | 55.7% | +2.5 pp | 1.72 |
| Both teams not to score | 41.7% | 44.3% | −2.5 pp | 2.40 |
| Lincoln City 2+ goals | 38.8% | 39.2% | −0.4 pp | 2.58 |
| Lincoln City at most 1 goal | 61.2% | 60.8% | +0.4 pp | 1.63 |
| Burnley 2+ goals | 36.3% | 41.1% | −4.9 pp | 2.76 |
| Burnley at most 1 goal | 63.7% | 58.9% | +4.9 pp | 1.57 |
| Over 1.5 goals | 77.0% | 74.5% | +2.5 pp | 1.30 |
| Under 1.5 goals | 23.0% | 25.5% | −2.5 pp | 4.34 |
| Over 2.5 goals | 48.5% | 50.0% | −1.5 pp | 2.06 |
| Under 2.5 goals | 51.5% | 50.0% | +1.5 pp | 1.94 |
Prices and probabilities are the ones stored before kick-off; nothing here is recalculated. Edge is the model's probability times the price, minus one, so a flagged outcome that lost is the ordinary case rather than a contradiction.
Model details
Show Hide
- Fit window
- the last 20 matches, recency weighted (a match 107 days old counts half)
- Lincoln City sample
- 11 matches
- Burnley sample
- 11 matches
- Computed
- 29 minutes before kick-off
- Prices taken
- 3 hours before kick-off
Limitations
The model reads expected goals and nothing else. It does not know the lineups, who is injured or suspended, what either side has to play for, the weather, or how congested the schedule around this match is.