xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Maxim De Cuyper

DEF · BHA · 5.0m · owned by 28%

2.25

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.5

That is 11.2 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 04/10 16:00

Maxim De Cuyper is the best value on the board: 2.25 points per million, from 11.2 over 5 rounds at 5.0m.

Price

5.0m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

11.2

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

28%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Maxim De Cuyper
    DEF BHA vs
    11.2 Ahead
    Value
    2.25
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    28%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  2. Ranked 2 Luka Vušković
    DEF BHA vs
    11.2 Ahead
    Value
    2.24
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    3.7%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  3. Ranked 3 Olivier Boscagli
    DEF BHA vs
    9.1 Ahead
    Value
    2.01
    Price
    4.5m
    Own
    0.3%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  4. Ranked 4 Ferdi Kadıoğlu
    DEF BHA vs
    7.2 Ahead
    Value
    1.63
    Price
    4.4m
    Own
    1.6%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  5. Ranked 5 Lewis Dunk !
    DEF BHA vs
    5.6 Ahead
    Value
    1.24
    Price
    4.5m
    Own
    1.5%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
DEF vs BHA · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.25
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.47
Own
28%
Mins
423
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.24
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.10
Own
3.7%
Mins
437
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.01
Pts
2.5
xGI
0.12
Own
0.3%
Mins
437
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 4.4m 75%
Value
1.63
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.07
Own
1.6%
Mins
332
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
5 Lewis Dunk ! 5.6
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 56%
Value
1.24
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.03
Own
1.5%
Mins
360
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
6 Pascal Struijk ! 2.2
DEF vs BHA · 4.9m 19%
Value
0.44
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.16
Own
0.2%
Mins
98
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
7 Jaouen Hadjam 1.7
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 10%
Value
0.38
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
8 Diego Coppola 1.6
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.35
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
9 Michael Svoboda 1.6
DEF vs BHA · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.31
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
4
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
10 Costinha 1.6
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.35
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.56
Own
0.0%
Mins
68
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.