xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Gameweek 6

Every player the model rates for this round, itemised into what he is expected to do rather than only what he is worth — and the squad the budget and the club limit allow.

This is the best fifteen money can buy. For advice about the squad you actually own →

Deadline
12:00 in 6d 13h

Saturday, 10/10/2026

Projected
50.7

points, starting XI

Fixture difficulty

Each club’s chance of winning this round’s fixture less its chance of losing it, in five bands.

  • 1 Win likelier than loss by 50+ points
  • 2 By 20 to 50 points
  • 3 Within 20 either way
  • 4 Loss likelier by 20 to 50
  • 5 Loss likelier by 50+

What the numbers mean

Worked through on this round's most one-sided fixture: the model gives Manchester United 57% to beat Tottenham Hotspur and 17% to lose, so the win is 40 percentage points the likelier — band 2. The other half of a fixture is the same subtraction the other way round, which puts Tottenham Hotspur on band 4. Hover any badge to see the figures behind it.

Budget 97.7m · 2.3m left

Fantasy data 01/10 11:39

Model coverage 54% on this site's data

Suggested squad

Formation 4-4-2 · 97.7m

Raya ARS · LEE (H) 4.07
V Thomas COV · NEW (H) 4.42
Gabriel ARS · LEE (H) 4.28
Calafiori ARS · LEE (H) 4.09
Egan HUL · EVE (H) 4.01
B.Fernandes MUN · TOT (H) 4.39
Mbeumo MUN · TOT (H) 4.36
Scott BOU · CHE (A) 4.00
E.Le Fée SUN · BHA (H) 3.98
C Haaland MCI · LIV (A) 4.56
Barry EVE · HUL (A) 4.00
Goalkeepers 4.1 pts
David Raya Martín ARS · LEE (H) · 6.1m 4.07
Defenders 16.8 pts
V Bobby Thomas COV · NEW (H) · 4.0m 4.42
Gabriel Magalhães ARS · LEE (H) · 8.0m 4.28
Riccardo Calafiori ARS · LEE (H) · 5.8m 4.09
John Egan HUL · EVE (H) · 4.1m 4.01
Midfielders 16.7 pts
Bruno Fernandes MUN · TOT (H) · 11.9m 4.39
Bryan Mbeumo MUN · TOT (H) · 7.9m 4.36
Alex Scott BOU · CHE (A) · 6.1m 4.00
Enzo Le Fée SUN · BHA (H) · 5.7m 3.98
Forwards 8.6 pts
C Erling Haaland MCI · LIV (A) · 15.6m 4.56
Thierno Barry EVE · HUL (A) · 5.7m 4.00
Bench
GKP Forster BOU · CHE (A) · 4.0m 8% start 0.57
1. FWD Walle Egeli IPS · FUL (H) · 4.5m 8% start 0.86
2. MID Hughes CRY · NFO (H) · 4.4m 8% start 0.72
3. DEF Kipré IPS · FUL (H) · 3.9m 8% start 0.49

Every candidate

Showing 20 of 487 — ranked by the model's projection for this gameweek.

  • Attack — goals and assists, rescaled to this fixture
  • Defence — the clean sheet, goals conceded, saves, defensive contribution
  • In the total and in no bar — the appearance, the bonus and the cards
  • PEN His club's first-choice penalty taker
  • PICK In the starting eleven this page suggests, not on its bench
  • Projected from Fantasy's figures alone

How to read a row

Worked through on this round's best projection: Bukayo Saka is projected at 4.57 points. 1.99 of that is attacking and 0.41 is defending, and those two are his bar — drawn against one scale the whole table shares, so a longer bar is a bigger number rather than a different one. The remaining 2.17 is in no bar at all: 1.87 for the appearance itself, 0.41 in bonus and −0.10 for cards. What each half is worth depends on the position as much as on the fixture — the same clean sheet pays a defender four points and a midfielder one.

Points are the model's expected Fantasy return for this fixture — the attack and defence split shows where they come from. Start % is the chance of appearing, so a high projection on a low start is a bench risk, not a bargain.

Show the next 20
Where the numbers come from

The model, not the feed

Clean-sheet and goals-conceded points come from this site's own model: a pair of expected-goal rates fitted for each fixture, run through a Dixon-Coles score matrix, so a clean sheet is priced as the probability of one rather than as an average. Goals and assists use Fantasy's own per-90 rates, rescaled to the fixture and shrunk towards the position average in proportion to how few minutes a player has behind him.

The largest source of error

Nobody publishes team sheets in advance. The start probability is estimated from recent rounds and the game's own fitness flags, and it is the largest source of error on this page — which is why it is shown beside every player rather than folded into his total.

The roughest term

Bonus is the roughest term here. It depends on finishing in the top three of a match's bonus-point ranking, which is a position among twenty-two players rather than a rate, so it is estimated from a player's own history and nothing more.