xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Alisson Becker

GKP · LIV · 5.5m · owned by 4.2%

2.21

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.5

That is 12.1 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 06/10 16:00

Alisson Becker is the best value on the board: 2.21 points per million, from a weighted projection of 12.1 over 5 rounds at 5.5m.

Price

5.5m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Weighted

12.1

His weighted projection over the next 5 rounds, which is what this board is ranked on.

Own

4.2%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Alisson Becker
    GKP LIV vs
    12.1 Weighted
    Value
    2.21
    Price
    5.5m
    Own
    4.2%
    3.0
    1. MCI (H)
    2. BRE (A)
    3. BHA (H)
    4. ARS (H)
    5. CRY (A)
  2. Ranked 2 Dominik Szoboszlai
    MID LIV vs
    12.0 Weighted
    Value
    1.74
    Price
    6.9m
    Own
    33%
    3.0
    1. MCI (H)
    2. BRE (A)
    3. BHA (H)
    4. ARS (H)
    5. CRY (A)
  3. Ranked 3 Virgil van Dijk
    DEF LIV vs
    11.5 Weighted
    Value
    1.77
    Price
    6.5m
    Own
    16%
    3.0
    1. MCI (H)
    2. BRE (A)
    3. BHA (H)
    4. ARS (H)
    5. CRY (A)
  4. Ranked 4 Alexander Isak !
    FWD LIV vs
    11.4 Weighted
    Value
    1.25
    Price
    9.1m
    Own
    22%
    3.0
    1. MCI (H)
    2. BRE (A)
    3. BHA (H)
    4. ARS (H)
    5. CRY (A)
  5. Ranked 5 Florian Wirtz
    MID LIV vs
    10.6 Weighted
    Value
    1.46
    Price
    7.3m
    Own
    5.7%
    3.0
    1. MCI (H)
    2. BRE (A)
    3. BHA (H)
    4. ARS (H)
    5. CRY (A)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
GKP vs LIV · 5.5m 92%
Value
2.21
Pts
3.6
xGI
0.00
Own
4.2%
Mins
450
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
MID vs LIV · 6.9m 92%
Value
1.74
Pts
3.7
xGI
0.46
Own
33%
Mins
440
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
DEF vs LIV · 6.5m 92%
Value
1.77
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.07
Own
16%
Mins
450
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
4 Alexander Isak ! 11.4
FWD vs LIV · 9.1m 69%
Value
1.25
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.79
Own
22%
Mins
413
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
5 Florian Wirtz 10.6
MID vs LIV · 7.3m 92%
Value
1.46
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.31
Own
5.7%
Mins
402
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
6 Cody Gakpo ! 8.0
MID vs LIV · 7.2m 56%
Value
1.11
Pts
2.4
xGI
0.58
Own
12%
Mins
370
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
7 Milos Kerkez 7.6
DEF vs LIV · 5.3m 75%
Value
1.43
Pts
2.2
xGI
0.04
Own
2.2%
Mins
385
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
8 Jeremy Jacquet ! 7.5
DEF vs LIV · 5.0m 69%
Value
1.49
Pts
2.2
xGI
0.03
Own
3.5%
Mins
415
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
9 Bradley Barcola 7.3
MID vs LIV · 8.0m 63%
Value
0.91
Pts
2.2
xGI
0.21
Own
1.9%
Mins
168
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
MID vs LIV · 5.4m 58%
Value
1.31
Pts
2.1
xGI
0.17
Own
1.3%
Mins
306
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
11 Ronald Araujo 6.2
DEF vs LIV · 5.4m 58%
Value
1.16
Pts
1.8
xGI
0.02
Own
3.1%
Mins
284
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
12 Victor Munoz 6.0
MID vs LIV · 6.5m 58%
Value
0.92
Pts
1.8
xGI
0.29
Own
0.9%
Mins
257
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
MID vs LIV · 5.8m 42%
Value
0.90
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.09
Own
1.1%
Mins
190
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
DEF vs LIV · 5.3m 42%
Value
0.82
Pts
1.3
xGI
0.13
Own
1.7%
Mins
178
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
15 Rio Ngumoha 3.9
MID vs LIV · 5.7m 25%
Value
0.68
Pts
1.2
xGI
0.19
Own
0.5%
Mins
99
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
  4. ARS (H)
  5. CRY (A)
each row's weighted projection, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted projection for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

Nearer rounds count more: the weighted projection multiplies each round's projected points by a weight that shrinks the further away the round is. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so the weighted projection is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What we've tested

  • Backtested ✓ Projected points

    Average error 1.617 points vs 1.842 for the simple baseline across 456 players. The baseline predicts each player's average so far; the test replayed gameweek 2 after it was played, recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026.