Fantasy Premier League
Best value in the game
Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.
Thierno Barry
FWD · EVE · 5.7m · owned by 8.3%
2.99
Value
every bar on one axis of 0 to 5.0
That is 17.0 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.
Gameweek 6 · 8-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39
Thierno Barry is the best value on the board: 2.99 points per million, from 17.0 over 8 rounds at 5.7m.
Price
5.7m
What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.
Ahead
17.0
His weighted score over the next 8 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.
Own
8.3%
The share of managers already holding him.
The top five on this board
The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.
-
Ranked 1 Erling Haaland20.6 Ahead
- Value
- 1.32
- Price
- 15.6m
- Own
- 74%
2.8- LIV (A)
- IPS (H)
- AVL (A)
- BHA (H)
- NFO (A)
- FUL (H)
- ARS (A)
- LEE (H)
-
Ranked 2 Thierno Barry17.0 Ahead
- Value
- 2.99
- Price
- 5.7m
- Own
- 8.3%
3.0- HUL (A)
- CHE (H)
- ARS (A)
- !
- COV (H)
- BRE (A)
- LIV (H)
- AVL (A)
-
Ranked 3 Gonzalo García16.4 Ahead
- Value
- 2.73
- Price
- 6.0m
- Own
- 4.0%
3.0- IPS (A)
- HUL (H)
- COV (A)
- AVL (A)
- NEW (H)
- MCI (A)
- BOU (H)
- TOT (A)
-
Ranked 4 Igor Thiago16.2 Ahead
- Value
- 2.07
- Price
- 7.8m
- Own
- 9.1%
3.3- AVL (A)
- LIV (H)
- HUL (A)
- NFO (H)
- BHA (A)
- EVE (H)
- MUN (A)
- ARS (H)
-
Ranked 5 Dominic Calvert-Lewin15.8 Ahead
- Value
- 2.64
- Price
- 6.0m
- Own
- 25%
3.5- ARS (A)
- MUN (H)
- SUN (A)
- BOU (A)
- TOT (H)
- CHE (A)
- COV (H)
- MCI (A)
- LIV (A)
- IPS (H)
- AVL (A)
- BHA (H)
- NFO (A)
- FUL (H)
- ARS (A)
- LEE (H)
- Value
- 1.32
- Pts
- 4.6
- xGI
- 0.99
- Own
- 74%
- Mins
- 450
- LIV (A)
- IPS (H)
- AVL (A)
- BHA (H)
- NFO (A)
- FUL (H)
- ARS (A)
- LEE (H)
- HUL (A)
- CHE (H)
- ARS (A)
- !
- COV (H)
- BRE (A)
- LIV (H)
- AVL (A)
- Value
- 2.99
- Pts
- 4.0
- xGI
- 0.79
- Own
- 8.3%
- Mins
- 417
- HUL (A)
- CHE (H)
- ARS (A)
- !
- COV (H)
- BRE (A)
- LIV (H)
- AVL (A)
- IPS (A)
- HUL (H)
- COV (A)
- AVL (A)
- NEW (H)
- MCI (A)
- BOU (H)
- TOT (A)
- Value
- 2.73
- Pts
- 3.9
- xGI
- 0.61
- Own
- 4.0%
- Mins
- 425
- IPS (A)
- HUL (H)
- COV (A)
- AVL (A)
- NEW (H)
- MCI (A)
- BOU (H)
- TOT (A)
- AVL (A)
- LIV (H)
- HUL (A)
- NFO (H)
- BHA (A)
- EVE (H)
- MUN (A)
- ARS (H)
- Value
- 2.07
- Pts
- 3.9
- xGI
- 0.67
- Own
- 9.1%
- Mins
- 442
- AVL (A)
- LIV (H)
- HUL (A)
- NFO (H)
- BHA (A)
- EVE (H)
- MUN (A)
- ARS (H)
- ARS (A)
- MUN (H)
- SUN (A)
- BOU (A)
- TOT (H)
- CHE (A)
- COV (H)
- MCI (A)
- Value
- 2.64
- Pts
- 3.3
- xGI
- 0.66
- Own
- 25%
- Mins
- 419
- ARS (A)
- MUN (H)
- SUN (A)
- BOU (A)
- TOT (H)
- CHE (A)
- COV (H)
- MCI (A)
- COV (A)
- AVL (H)
- CRY (A)
- !
- FUL (A)
- ARS (H)
- BHA (A)
- MUN (H)
- Value
- 2.55
- Pts
- 3.7
- xGI
- 0.49
- Own
- 19%
- Mins
- 441
- COV (A)
- AVL (H)
- CRY (A)
- !
- FUL (A)
- ARS (H)
- BHA (A)
- MUN (H)
- EVE (H)
- FUL (A)
- BRE (H)
- IPS (H)
- ARS (A)
- BHA (H)
- CRY (A)
- NFO (H)
- Value
- 2.64
- Pts
- 3.6
- xGI
- 0.28
- Own
- 1.9%
- Mins
- 441
- EVE (H)
- FUL (A)
- BRE (H)
- IPS (H)
- ARS (A)
- BHA (H)
- CRY (A)
- NFO (H)
What this board is, and what it is not
Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.
Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.
The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 8 weights sum to 4.16, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.
The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.
The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.
What is measured here, and what is not
-
Measured The projected points
Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.