xgEdge

La Liga expected points table 2026/2027

Every La Liga club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

Barcelona lead on expected points with 18.59 over 7 matches with xG. That is 2.71 clear of Real Madrid. Real Betis sit 8 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 3 against 11 on expected points. Espanyol sit 7 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 15 against 8 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
La Liga: table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: Villarreal (9 in the table, 3 on xPts), Athletic Club (10 in the table, 5 on xPts), Osasuna (13 in the table, 7 on xPts), Espanyol (15 in the table, 8 on xPts), Sevilla (5 in the table, 9 on xPts), Celta Vigo (14 in the table, 10 on xPts), Real Betis (3 in the table, 11 on xPts), Real Sociedad (8 in the table, 12 on xPts), Elche (18 in the table, 13 on xPts), Deportivo La Coruña (7 in the table, 14 on xPts), Rayo Vallecano (12 in the table, 16 on xPts), and Getafe (11 in the table, 17 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

La Liga expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 BAR 7 21 18.59 +2.41 1 Same place as on expected points
2 RMA 7 15 15.87 −0.87 4 2 places below its expected-points rank
3 VIL 7 8 13.47 −5.47 9 6 places below its expected-points rank
4 ATM 7 16 13.00 +3.00 2 2 places above its expected-points rank
5 ATH 6 8 10.92 −2.92 10 5 places below its expected-points rank
6 ALA 7 11 10.06 +0.94 6 Same place as on expected points
7 OSA 7 8 9.50 −1.50 13 6 places below its expected-points rank
8 ESP 7 7 9.45 −2.45 15 7 places below its expected-points rank
9 SEV 7 13 9.13 +3.87 5 4 places above its expected-points rank
10 CEL 7 7 8.99 −1.99 14 4 places below its expected-points rank
11 BET 7 16 8.41 +7.59 3 8 places above its expected-points rank
12 RSO 7 10 8.16 +1.84 8 4 places above its expected-points rank
13 ELC 7 5 8.00 −3.00 18 5 places below its expected-points rank
14 RAC 7 7 7.97 −0.97 16 2 places below its expected-points rank
14 DEP 7 10 7.97 +2.03 7 7 places above its expected-points rank
16 RAY 7 8 7.87 +0.13 12 4 places above its expected-points rank
17 GET 7 8 6.41 +1.59 11 6 places above its expected-points rank
18 VAL 7 4 6.40 −2.40 19 1 place below its expected-points rank
19 LEV 6 5 6.25 −1.25 17 2 places above its expected-points rank
20 MAL 7 3 5.99 −2.99 20 Same place as on expected points
  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →