xgEdge

Ligue 1 expected points table 2026/2027

Every Ligue 1 club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

Paris FC lead on expected points with 10.86 over 5 matches with xG. Stade Rennais sit 10 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 5 against 15 on expected points. RC Lens sit 9 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 15 against 6 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
Ligue 1: table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: Paris Saint-Germain (6 in the table, 2 on xPts), Stade Brestois (11 in the table, 4 on xPts), Toulouse (13 in the table, 5 on xPts), RC Lens (15 in the table, 6 on xPts), AS Monaco (1 in the table, 8 on xPts), Lille (4 in the table, 10 on xPts), Le Havre (18 in the table, 12 on xPts), Auxerre (10 in the table, 13 on xPts), Olympique de Marseille (17 in the table, 14 on xPts), Stade Rennais (5 in the table, 15 on xPts), Nice (14 in the table, 17 on xPts), and RC Strasbourg (8 in the table, 18 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

Ligue 1 expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 PFC 5 11 10.86 +0.14 3 2 places below its expected-points rank
2 PSG 5 8 10.32 −2.32 6 4 places below its expected-points rank
3 LYO 5 11 9.04 +1.96 2 1 place above its expected-points rank
4 BRE 5 5 8.92 −3.92 11 7 places below its expected-points rank
5 TFC 5 5 8.68 −3.68 13 8 places below its expected-points rank
6 RCL 5 4 7.47 −3.47 15 9 places below its expected-points rank
7 ANG 5 7 7.43 −0.43 7 Same place as on expected points
8 ASM 5 13 7.10 +5.90 1 7 places above its expected-points rank
9 LMA 5 6 6.37 −0.37 9 Same place as on expected points
10 LIL 5 10 6.18 +3.82 4 6 places above its expected-points rank
11 LOR 5 5 6.06 −1.06 12 1 place below its expected-points rank
12 HAC 5 2 6.01 −4.01 18 6 places below its expected-points rank
13 AUX 5 6 5.91 +0.09 10 3 places above its expected-points rank
14 MAR 5 3 5.43 −2.43 17 3 places below its expected-points rank
15 REN 5 10 5.41 +4.59 5 10 places above its expected-points rank
16 TRO 5 4 4.82 −0.82 16 Same place as on expected points
17 NIC 5 5 4.71 +0.29 14 3 places above its expected-points rank
18 RCS 5 7 4.18 +2.82 8 10 places above its expected-points rank
  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →