xgEdge

SuperLiga (Romania) xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every SuperLiga (Romania) club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

Universitatea Craiova lead on expected-goal difference, +1.34 a match over 9 matches with xG. That is 0.32 a match clear of FC Dinamo București. FK Csíkszereda Miercurea Ciuc sit at the foot on −1.22 a match.

Attack and defence

SuperLiga (Romania): every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Universitatea Craiova UNI FC Dinamo București FC Rapid București UTA Arad FCSB FC Universitatea Cluj FC Corvinul Hunedoara FC Argeș Pitești FCA CFR 1907 Cluj FC Farul Constanța FC Botoșani FCB SC Oțelul Galați Sepsi OSK FC Petrolul Ploieşti FCP FC Voluntari FK Csíkszereda Miercurea Ciuc
Every SuperLiga (Romania) club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
UNI 2.45 1.11 +1.34
FCD 2.17 1.15 +1.02
FCR 1.79 1.12 +0.66
UTA 1.87 1.24 +0.63
FCS 2.18 1.70 +0.48
FCU 1.98 1.70 +0.28
FCC 1.61 1.49 +0.11
FCA 1.18 1.21 −0.03
CFR 1.99 2.04 −0.05
FCF 1.63 1.68 −0.05
FCB 1.99 2.10 −0.11
SCO 1.33 1.78 −0.45
SEP 1.19 1.73 −0.54
FCP 1.34 2.38 −1.04
FCV 1.53 2.61 −1.08
FKC 0.74 1.95 −1.22
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

All xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
SuperLiga (Romania) xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P xG xGA xGD xGD/match Pts
1 UNI 10 22.03 9.97 +12.06 +1.34 20
2 FCD 10 19.52 10.38 +9.14 +1.02 23
3 FCR 10 14.29 8.97 +5.32 +0.66 21
4 UTA 10 16.84 11.20 +5.64 +0.63 12
5 FCS 10 21.83 17.04 +4.79 +0.48 12
6 FCU 9 17.81 15.30 +2.51 +0.28 15
7 FCC 10 14.47 13.45 +1.02 +0.11 13
8 FCA 10 9.47 9.70 −0.23 −0.03 11
9 CFR 9 13.95 14.27 −0.32 −0.05 13
9 FCF 10 14.67 15.13 −0.46 −0.05 14
11 FCB 10 19.87 21.01 −1.14 −0.11 11
12 SCO 10 11.98 16.06 −4.08 −0.45 10
13 SEP 10 11.91 17.28 −5.37 −0.54 13
14 FCP 10 12.07 21.39 −9.32 −1.04 19
15 FCV 10 12.22 20.84 −8.62 −1.08 8
16 FKC 10 6.63 17.57 −10.94 −1.22 1

12 of the 16 clubs here have expected figures over fewer matches than they have played. For those clubs every expected figure counts only the matches with xG, and the goals it is compared with come from those same matches.

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
xG
— Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a team took
xGA
— Expected goals against: the summed chance quality of the shots a team allowed
xGD
— xG minus xGA
xGD/match
— xG minus xGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →