xgEdge

SuperLiga (Serbia) expected points table 2026/2027

Every SuperLiga (Serbia) club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

FK Vojvodina lead on expected points with 17.41 over 9 matches with xG. FK Mladost Lučani sit 9 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 4 against 13 on expected points. FK Partizan sit 7 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 11 against 4 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
SuperLiga (Serbia): table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: FK Partizan (11 in the table, 4 on xPts), FK Radnički Niš (12 in the table, 5 on xPts), FK Čukarički (9 in the table, 6 on xPts), FK Železničar Pančevo (6 in the table, 10 on xPts), and FK Mladost Lučani (4 in the table, 13 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

SuperLiga (Serbia) expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 FKV 10 22 17.41 +4.59 2 1 place below its expected-points rank
2 FKR 9 17 17.27 −0.27 3 1 place below its expected-points rank
3 FKC 10 28 16.50 +4.50 1 2 places above its expected-points rank
4 FKP 9 8 14.50 −9.50 11 7 places below its expected-points rank
5 FKR 9 8 13.63 −5.63 12 7 places below its expected-points rank
6 FKČ 10 11 11.85 −1.85 9 3 places below its expected-points rank
7 FKI 10 15 11.66 −0.66 5 2 places above its expected-points rank
8 FKN 10 13 11.53 −2.53 8 Same place as on expected points
9 FKR 10 14 9.76 +2.24 7 2 places above its expected-points rank
10 FKŽ 9 14 8.88 +1.12 6 4 places above its expected-points rank
11 OFK 10 9 6.03 −2.03 10 1 place above its expected-points rank
12 FKM 10 8 5.47 −0.47 13 1 place below its expected-points rank
13 FKM 10 16 3.45 +6.55 4 9 places above its expected-points rank
14 FKZ 10 3 1.39 +1.61 14 Same place as on expected points

12 of the 14 clubs here have expected figures over fewer matches than they have played. For those clubs every expected figure counts only the matches with xG, and the goals it is compared with come from those same matches.

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →