Swiss Super League table 2026/2027
Swiss Super League splits into groups late in the season. This table counts every league match; the official table may differ.
The standings, with the expected figures beside them: what each club's chances were worth, match by match, next to what it actually took.
Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is unchanged.
| # restore the table order | Team | P sort descending | W sort descending | D sort descending | L sort descending | GF sort descending | GA sort descending | GD sort descending | Pts sort descending | npxG sort descending | npxGA sort descending | npxGD sort descending | xPts sort descending | Pts vs xPts sort descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Lugano FCL | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 7 | +20 | 25 | 15.84 | 10.71 | +5.13 | 15.35 | +9.65 |
| 2 | Young Boys YOU | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 31 | 18 | +13 | 19 | 19.02 | 12.16 | +6.86 | 17.13 | +1.87 |
| 3 | FC Sion FCS | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 14 | +9 | 19 | 19.23 | 11.44 | +7.79 | 17.08 | +1.92 |
| 4 | Basel BAS | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 13 | 9.42 | 12.50 | −3.08 | 11.30 | +1.70 |
| 5 | FC St. Gallen 1879 FCS | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 19 | −3 | 13 | 16.45 | 12.07 | +4.38 | 15.36 | −2.36 |
| 6 | FC Luzern FCL | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 18 | −1 | 12 | 16.56 | 17.23 | −0.67 | 12.22 | −0.22 |
| 7 | FC Zürich FCZ | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 20 | −6 | 11 | 12.04 | 15.75 | −3.71 | 10.07 | +0.93 |
| 8 | Servette FC SER | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 13 | −2 | 10 | 10.98 | 13.52 | −2.54 | 11.67 | −1.67 |
| 9 | FC Thun FCT | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 23 | −8 | 10 | 14.27 | 18.36 | −4.09 | 9.00 | +1.00 |
| 10 | Grasshopper Club Zürich GRA | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 24 | −11 | 8 | 16.34 | 18.00 | −1.66 | 11.60 | −3.60 |
| 11 | FC Vaduz FCV | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 21 | −3 | 6 | 14.14 | 18.18 | −4.04 | 10.61 | −4.61 |
| 12 | FC Lausanne-Sport FCL | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | −8 | 6 | 7.64 | 12.01 | −4.37 | 8.42 | −2.42 |
- More points than xPts
- Fewer points than xPts
The provider published an implausible non-penalty figure for 1 of these matches — under 50% of the match total, which needs more penalties than a match usually has. Those matches fall back to total xG in the npxG columns.
How to read this table
- xG
- Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a club took. A chance scored nine times in ten is worth 0.9.
- xGA
- Expected goals against: the same measure for the shots a club allowed.
- xGD
- xG minus xGA: how far a club's chances outweighed its opponents', or the other way round.
- xPts
- Expected points: the points a club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average. Each match's two xG figures become chances of a win, a draw and a loss, and a win is worth 3 and a draw 1.
- Pts vs xPts
- Actual points minus expected points based on match xG. Positive, drawn in green, is more points than the chances were worth on average; negative, in red, is fewer. It measures the gap and says nothing about its cause.
- npxG
- Non-penalty xG: xG with penalties removed, offered where the competition's figures support it. It changes xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is always worked out from all xG.
Expected points are read off the same score matrix that prices the board: each played match's two xG totals are taken as scoring rates, and the team's share is 3 × P(win) + 1 × P(draw), summed over the season. Understat arrives at the same figure by simulating each shot, which needs per-shot data, held here for %{competitions}. Passes per defensive action and deep completions are not shown because no source here ingests the event data behind them.