Eliteserien

Eliteserien table 2025/2026

Leader Viking FK 71 pts
Most above xPts Viking FK +13.40 against expected points
Most below xPts KFUM Oslo −12.91 against expected points

Eliteserien clubs ranked by expected points (xPts) in 2025/2026, with the points each actually took beside them. Bodø/Glimt lead on expected points with 64.82 xPts, while Viking FK top the table.

Actual table Expected table

Eliteserien 2025/2026 table ranked on expected points
# restore the table order	Move sort descending	Team	P sort descending	W sort descending	D sort descending	L sort descending	GF sort descending	GA sort descending	GD sort descending	Pts sort descending	xG sort descending	xGA sort descending	xGD sort descending	xPts sort descending	Pts vs xPts sort descending
1	Up 1 place against the actual table	Bodø/Glimt BOD	30	22	4	4	85	28	+57	70	76.88	31.38	+45.50	64.82	+5.18
2	Up 2 places against the actual table	SK Brann SKB	30	17	5	8	55	46	+9	56	58.02	31.67	+26.35	58.95	−2.95
3	Down 2 places against the actual table	Viking FK VIK	30	22	5	3	77	36	+41	71	59.77	34.08	+25.69	57.60	+13.40
4	Down 1 place against the actual table	Tromsø IL TRO	30	18	3	9	50	36	+14	57	49.99	34.65	+15.34	50.46	+6.54
5	Up 7 places against the actual table	KFUM Oslo KFU	30	8	11	11	42	41	+1	35	41.75	31.68	+10.07	47.91	−12.91
6	Up 2 places against the actual table	Sarpsborg 08 SAR	30	11	8	11	48	50	−2	41	55.61	48.77	+6.84	45.40	−4.40
7	Down 1 place against the actual table	Rosenborg BK ROS	30	11	9	10	45	42	+3	42	46.34	42.91	+3.43	43.98	−1.98
8	Up 2 places against the actual table	Molde FK MOL	30	12	3	15	46	42	+4	39	47.84	41.17	+6.67	43.76	−4.76
9	Down 4 places against the actual table	Sandefjord Fotball SAN	30	15	3	12	55	42	+13	48	43.33	47.22	−3.89	39.65	+8.35
10	Up 4 places against the actual table	Bryne FK BRY	32	9	7	16	38	60	−22	34	42.15	50.08	−7.93	38.79	−4.79
11	Down 4 places against the actual table	Fredrikstad FK FRE	30	11	9	10	38	35	+3	42	40.14	46.07	−5.93	37.64	+4.36
12	Down 3 places against the actual table	Vålerenga IF VÅL	30	12	5	13	49	53	−4	41	43.01	53.16	−10.15	36.37	+4.63
13	Down 2 places against the actual table	HamKam HAM	30	10	7	13	42	47	−5	37	38.07	51.91	−13.84	34.31	+2.69
14	Down 1 place against the actual table	Kristiansund BK KRI	30	9	8	13	37	59	−22	35	35.41	57.43	−22.02	29.02	+5.98
15	Same place as in the actual table	Strømsgodset STR	30	6	2	22	37	72	−35	20	38.88	67.72	−28.84	26.64	−6.64
16	Same place as in the actual table	Haugesund HAU	30	2	3	25	22	80	−58	9	24.99	74.36	−49.37	15.01	−6.01
17	Same place as in the actual table	Aalesunds FK AAL	4	1	2	1	9	6	+3	5	10.75	4.90	+5.85	8.23	−3.23
18	Up 2 places against the actual table	Ranheim IL RAN	1	0	0	1	2	3	−1	0	2.31	0.91	+1.40	2.36	−2.36
19	Same place as in the actual table	Kongsvinger KON	1	0	1	0	4	4	0	1	2.20	2.77	−0.57	1.04	−0.04
20	Down 2 places against the actual table	Egersund EGE	2	1	1	0	4	3	+1	4	1.69	6.29	−4.60	0.55	+3.45

More points than xPts
Fewer points than xPts

Ranked by xPts. ▲ / ▼ beside the rank shows how far a club sits above or below its place in the actual table.

How to read this table

xG: Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a club took. A chance scored nine times in ten is worth 0.9.
xGA: Expected goals against: the same measure for the shots a club allowed.
xGD: xG minus xGA: how far a club's chances outweighed its opponents', or the other way round.
xPts: Expected points: the points a club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average. Each match's two xG figures become chances of a win, a draw and a loss, and a win is worth 3 and a draw 1.
Pts vs xPts: Actual points minus expected points based on match xG. Positive, drawn in green, is more points than the chances were worth on average; negative, in red, is fewer. It measures the gap and says nothing about its cause.
npxG: Non-penalty xG: xG with penalties removed, offered where the competition's figures support it. It changes xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is always worked out from all xG.

Expected points are read off the same score matrix that prices the board: each played match's two xG totals are taken as scoring rates, and the team's share is 3 × P(win) + 1 × P(draw), summed over the season. Understat arrives at the same figure by simulating each shot, which needs per-shot data, held here for %{competitions}. Passes per defensive action and deep completions are not shown because no source here ingests the event data behind them.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →