xgEdge

Eliteserien xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every Eliteserien club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from the expected-goal columns; goals, G − xG and the rates taken from goals are unchanged.

Bodø/Glimt lead on expected-goal difference, +1.15 a match over 21 matches with xG. That is 0.35 a match clear of Viking FK. HamKam sit at the foot on −0.67 a match.

  • Best attack

    2.03 Bodø/Glimt

    42.56 xG in 21 matches

  • Best defence

    0.87 Bodø/Glimt

    18.33 xGA in 21 matches

  • Widest xG difference

    +1.15 Bodø/Glimt

    +24.23 xGD in 21 matches

Attack and defence

Eliteserien: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Bodø/Glimt BOD Viking FK Molde FK Tromsø IL Sarpsborg 08 Lillestrøm SK Rosenborg BK SK Brann Vålerenga IF IK Start Sandefjord Fotball SAN Fredrikstad FK Aalesunds FK AAL KFUM Oslo Kristiansund BK HamKam HAM
Every Eliteserien club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
BOD 2.03 0.87 +1.15
VIK 1.82 1.01 +0.81
MOL 1.71 1.12 +0.59
TRO 1.52 1.16 +0.36
SAR 1.35 1.17 +0.18
LIL 1.30 1.22 +0.08
ROS 1.39 1.37 +0.02
SKB 1.36 1.41 −0.05
VÅL 1.43 1.48 −0.05
IKS 1.26 1.39 −0.13
SAN 1.06 1.31 −0.25
FRE 1.15 1.52 −0.38
AAL 1.34 1.86 −0.51
KFU 0.99 1.54 −0.55
KRI 0.95 1.54 −0.59
HAM 1.01 1.68 −0.67
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

Non-penalty xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Eliteserien xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P npxG npxGA npxGD npxGD/match Pts
1 BOD 21 42.56 18.33 +24.23 +1.15 50
2 VIK 21 38.14 21.16 +16.98 +0.81 50
3 MOL 21 35.88 23.54 +12.34 +0.59 36
4 TRO 21 31.95 24.44 +7.51 +0.36 38
5 SAR 21 28.39 24.55 +3.84 +0.18 25
6 LIL 21 27.26 25.68 +1.58 +0.08 32
7 ROS 21 29.25 28.86 +0.39 +0.02 33
8 SKB 21 28.56 29.61 −1.05 −0.05 29
8 VÅL 21 30.02 31.09 −1.07 −0.05 23
10 IKS 21 26.48 29.27 −2.79 −0.13 16
11 SAN 21 22.35 27.59 −5.24 −0.25 23
12 FRE 21 24.06 32.01 −7.95 −0.38 28
13 AAL 21 28.24 39.05 −10.81 −0.51 21
14 KFU 21 20.87 32.39 −11.52 −0.55 25
15 KRI 21 19.93 32.40 −12.47 −0.59 19
16 HAM 21 21.21 35.18 −13.97 −0.67 23

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
npxG
— Non-penalty expected goals: xG with penalties removed
npxGA
— Non-penalty expected goals against: xGA with penalties removed
npxGD
— npxG minus npxGA
npxGD/match
— npxG minus npxGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →