xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Vitaly Janelt

MID · BRE · 5.0m · owned by 2.5%

2.67

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 5.0

That is 13.3 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Vitaly Janelt is the best value on the board: 2.67 points per million, from 13.3 over 5 rounds at 5.0m.

Price

5.0m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

13.3

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

2.5%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Vitaly Janelt
    MID BRE vs
    13.3 Ahead
    Value
    2.67
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    2.5%
    3.2
    1. AVL (A)
    2. LIV (H)
    3. HUL (A)
    4. NFO (H)
    5. BHA (A)
  2. Ranked 2 Igor Thiago
    FWD BRE vs
    13.1 Ahead
    Value
    1.68
    Price
    7.8m
    Own
    9.1%
    3.2
    1. AVL (A)
    2. LIV (H)
    3. HUL (A)
    4. NFO (H)
    5. BHA (A)
  3. Ranked 3 Kevin Schade
    MID BRE vs
    12.7 Ahead
    Value
    2.05
    Price
    6.2m
    Own
    12%
    3.2
    1. AVL (A)
    2. LIV (H)
    3. HUL (A)
    4. NFO (H)
    5. BHA (A)
  4. Ranked 4 Kristoffer Ajer
    DEF BRE vs
    11.5 Ahead
    Value
    2.56
    Price
    4.5m
    Own
    3.9%
    3.2
    1. AVL (A)
    2. LIV (H)
    3. HUL (A)
    4. NFO (H)
    5. BHA (A)
  5. Ranked 5 Caoimhín Kelleher
    GKP BRE vs
    11.2 Ahead
    Value
    2.25
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    6.1%
    3.2
    1. AVL (A)
    2. LIV (H)
    3. HUL (A)
    4. NFO (H)
    5. BHA (A)
Position
All GKP DEF MID FWD
Minutes played
Any 90+ 270+ 450+ 900+
At least
Any Very safe Safe Rotation risk
Rounds ahead
3 rounds 5 rounds 8 rounds
Price
Enter your squad to mark what you already own and what you could afford →
Showing 23 of 23 players 23 of 487 match your filters Clear filters
1 Vitaly Janelt 13.3
MID vs BRE · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.67
Pts
4.0
xGI
0.20
Own
2.5%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
2 Igor Thiago 13.1
FWD vs BRE · 7.8m 92%
Value
1.68
Pts
3.9
xGI
0.67
Own
9.1%
Mins
442
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
3 Kevin Schade 12.7
MID vs BRE · 6.2m 92%
Value
2.05
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.37
Own
12%
Mins
447
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
4 Kristoffer Ajer 11.5
DEF vs BRE · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.56
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.05
Own
3.9%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
5 Caoimhín Kelleher 11.2
GKP vs BRE · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.25
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.00
Own
6.1%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
6 Keane Lewis-Potter 11.0
MID vs BRE · 5.5m 92%
Value
2.00
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.45
Own
1.7%
Mins
406
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
7 Mamadou Sangaré 8.7
MID vs BRE · 5.6m 75%
Value
1.55
Pts
2.6
xGI
0.29
Own
9.9%
Mins
321
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
8 Mikkel Damsgaard 7.6
MID vs BRE · 5.4m 58%
Value
1.40
Pts
2.3
xGI
0.28
Own
0.4%
Mins
283
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
9 Michael Kayode 6.9
DEF vs BRE · 4.6m 75%
Value
1.51
Pts
2.1
xGI
0.30
Own
7.6%
Mins
294
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
10 Jaidon Anthony 6.6
MID vs BRE · 5.9m 58%
Value
1.12
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.57
Own
0.1%
Mins
267
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
11 Dango Ouattara 5.4
MID vs BRE · 6.3m 42%
Value
0.86
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.25
Own
0.5%
Mins
179
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
12 Yehor Yarmoliuk 5.2
MID vs BRE · 4.8m 42%
Value
1.08
Pts
1.5
xGI
0.16
Own
0.6%
Mins
216
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
13 Jannik Schuster 4.9
DEF vs BRE · 4.5m 42%
Value
1.09
Pts
1.5
xGI
0.23
Own
0.3%
Mins
253
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
14 Ellery Balcombe 3.5
GKP vs BRE · 4.0m 25%
Value
0.88
Pts
1.1
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
15 Gustavo Nunes 3.2
MID vs BRE · 4.5m 17%
Value
0.70
Pts
0.9
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
16 Benjamin Fredrick 3.0
DEF vs BRE · 4.0m 25%
Value
0.74
Pts
0.9
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
17 Aaron Hickey 2.9
DEF vs BRE · 4.5m 25%
Value
0.65
Pts
0.9
xGI
0.06
Own
0.1%
Mins
152
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
18 Callum Wilson 2.8
FWD vs BRE · 5.4m 8.3%
Value
0.51
Pts
0.8
xGI
0.76
Own
0.3%
Mins
13
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
19 Fábio Carvalho 2.5
MID vs BRE · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.49
Pts
0.7
xGI
12.90
Own
0.0%
Mins
3
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
20 Hákon Rafn Valdimarsson 1.9
GKP vs BRE · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.42
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
21 El Hadji Malick Diouf 1.7
DEF vs BRE · 4.5m 10%
Value
0.38
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.02
Own
0.1%
Mins
39
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
22 Kim Ji-Soo 1.6
DEF vs BRE · 4.4m 8.3%
Value
0.36
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
23 Rico Henry 1.6
DEF vs BRE · 4.4m 8.3%
Value
0.36
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.2%
Mins
2
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
  4. NFO (H)
  5. BHA (A)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.

Mind if we count your visit?

We use Google Analytics only to see how many people visit and which pages they read. It loads after you allow it — no ads, no tracking across other sites. What we collect