xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Leif Davis

DEF · IPS · 4.0m · owned by 6.9%

1.96

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.0

That is 7.8 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 3-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Leif Davis is the best value on the board: 1.96 points per million, from 7.8 over 3 rounds at 4.0m.

Price

4.0m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

7.8

His weighted score over the next 3 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

6.9%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Gabriel Magalhães
    DEF ARS vs
    10.0 Ahead
    Value
    1.25
    Price
    8.0m
    Own
    23%
    2.3
    1. LEE (H)
    2. NFO (A)
    3. EVE (H)
  2. Ranked 2 James Tarkowski
    DEF EVE vs
    9.5 Ahead
    Value
    1.53
    Price
    6.2m
    Own
    17%
    3.3
    1. HUL (A)
    2. CHE (H)
    3. ARS (A)
  3. Ranked 3 António Silva
    DEF BOU vs
    9.4 Ahead
    Value
    1.87
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    0.4%
    3.3
    1. CHE (A)
    2. SUN (H)
    3. MUN (A)
  4. Ranked 4 Tarik Muharemović
    DEF LEE vs
    8.8 Ahead
    Value
    1.77
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    4.3%
    3.7
    1. ARS (A)
    2. MUN (H)
    3. SUN (A)
  5. Ranked 5 Sven Botman
    DEF NEW vs
    8.8 Ahead
    Value
    1.76
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    0.7%
    3.7
    1. COV (A)
    2. AVL (H)
    3. CRY (A)
Position
All GKP DEF MID FWD
Minutes played
Any 90+ 270+ 450+ 900+
At least
Any Very safe Safe Rotation risk
Rounds ahead
3 rounds 5 rounds 8 rounds
Price
Enter your squad to mark what you already own and what you could afford →
Showing 25 of 25 players 25 of 487 match your filters Clear filters
1 Gabriel Magalhães 10.0
DEF vs ARS · 8.0m 92%
Value
1.25
Pts
4.3
xGI
0.14
Own
23%
Mins
450
  1. LEE (H)
  2. NFO (A)
  3. EVE (H)
2 James Tarkowski 9.5
DEF vs EVE · 6.2m 92%
Value
1.53
Pts
3.9
xGI
0.05
Own
17%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
3 António Silva 9.4
DEF vs BOU · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.87
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.23
Own
0.4%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
4 Tarik Muharemović 8.8
DEF vs LEE · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.77
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.11
Own
4.3%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
5 Sven Botman 8.8
DEF vs NEW · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.76
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.04
Own
0.7%
Mins
450
  1. COV (A)
  2. AVL (H)
  3. CRY (A)
6 Chris Richards 8.7
DEF vs CRY · 4.9m 92%
Value
1.78
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.03
Own
0.6%
Mins
450
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
7 Jarrad Branthwaite 8.7
DEF vs EVE · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.58
Pts
3.6
xGI
0.03
Own
2.4%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
8 Kristoffer Ajer 8.5
DEF vs BRE · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.88
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.05
Own
3.9%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
9 Marc Guéhi 8.4
DEF vs MCI · 6.0m 92%
Value
1.40
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.27
Own
18%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
10 James Hill 8.3
DEF vs BOU · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.51
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.16
Own
0.8%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
11 Virgil van Dijk 8.2
DEF vs LIV · 6.5m 92%
Value
1.26
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.07
Own
16%
Mins
450
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
12 Adrien Truffert 8.0
DEF vs BOU · 5.4m 92%
Value
1.49
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.08
Own
3.0%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
13 James Justin 8.0
DEF vs LEE · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.78
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.12
Own
1.4%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
14 Harry Maguire 7.9
DEF vs MUN · 4.8m 92%
Value
1.65
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.13
Own
8.6%
Mins
450
  1. TOT (H)
  2. LEE (A)
  3. BOU (H)
15 Leif Davis 7.8
DEF vs IPS · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.96
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.41
Own
6.9%
Mins
450
  1. FUL (H)
  2. MCI (A)
  3. NFO (H)
16 Dara O'Shea 7.8
DEF vs IPS · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.95
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.06
Own
2.7%
Mins
450
  1. FUL (H)
  2. MCI (A)
  3. NFO (H)
17 Malick Thiaw 7.6
DEF vs NEW · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.51
Pts
3.0
xGI
0.02
Own
2.2%
Mins
450
  1. COV (A)
  2. AVL (H)
  3. CRY (A)
18 Vitalii Mykolenko 7.6
DEF vs EVE · 4.6m 92%
Value
1.64
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.04
Own
4.2%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
19 Neco Williams 7.5
DEF vs NFO · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.50
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.20
Own
8.7%
Mins
450
  1. CRY (A)
  2. ARS (H)
  3. IPS (A)
20 Issa Diop 7.5
DEF vs IPS · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.87
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.04
Own
13%
Mins
450
  1. FUL (H)
  2. MCI (A)
  3. NFO (H)
21 Rúben Dias 7.2
DEF vs MCI · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.31
Pts
2.7
xGI
0.21
Own
1.9%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
22 Calvin Bassey 6.9
DEF vs FUL · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.53
Pts
2.6
xGI
0.05
Own
0.7%
Mins
450
  1. IPS (A)
  2. HUL (H)
  3. COV (A)
23 Victor Lindelöf 6.9
DEF vs AVL · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.52
Pts
2.9
xGI
0.12
Own
0.3%
Mins
450
  1. BRE (H)
  2. NEW (A)
  3. MCI (H)
24 Daniel Ballard ! 5.7
DEF vs SUN · 4.9m 69%
Value
1.17
Pts
2.3
xGI
0.09
Own
2.5%
Mins
450
  1. BHA (H)
  2. BOU (A)
  3. LEE (H)
25 Jan Paul van Hecke ! 5.7
DEF vs TOT · 4.9m 69%
Value
1.17
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.22
Own
6.5%
Mins
450
  1. MUN (A)
  2. COV (H)
  3. CHE (A)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 10

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 3 weights sum to 2.44, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.

Mind if we count your visit?

We use Google Analytics only to see how many people visit and which pages they read. It loads after you allow it — no ads, no tracking across other sites. What we collect