xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Leif Davis

DEF · IPS · 4.0m · owned by 6.9%

1.96

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.0

That is 7.8 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 3-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Leif Davis is the best value on the board: 1.96 points per million, from 7.8 over 3 rounds at 4.0m.

Price

4.0m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

7.8

His weighted score over the next 3 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

6.9%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Erling Haaland
    FWD MCI vs
    12.1 Ahead
    Value
    0.77
    Price
    15.6m
    Own
    74%
    2.7
    1. LIV (A)
    2. IPS (H)
    3. AVL (A)
  2. Ranked 2 Bruno Fernandes
    MID MUN vs
    10.3 Ahead
    Value
    0.87
    Price
    11.9m
    Own
    39%
    2.3
    1. TOT (H)
    2. LEE (A)
    3. BOU (H)
  3. Ranked 3 Bryan Mbeumo
    MID MUN vs
    10.2 Ahead
    Value
    1.29
    Price
    7.9m
    Own
    21%
    2.3
    1. TOT (H)
    2. LEE (A)
    3. BOU (H)
  4. Ranked 4 Gabriel Magalhães
    DEF ARS vs
    10.0 Ahead
    Value
    1.25
    Price
    8.0m
    Own
    23%
    2.3
    1. LEE (H)
    2. NFO (A)
    3. EVE (H)
  5. Ranked 5 David Raya Martín
    GKP ARS vs
    9.7 Ahead
    Value
    1.58
    Price
    6.1m
    Own
    42%
    2.3
    1. LEE (H)
    2. NFO (A)
    3. EVE (H)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
FWD vs MCI · 15.6m 92%
Value
0.77
Pts
4.6
xGI
0.99
Own
74%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
MID vs MUN · 11.9m 92%
Value
0.87
Pts
4.4
xGI
0.77
Own
39%
Mins
450
  1. TOT (H)
  2. LEE (A)
  3. BOU (H)
3 Bryan Mbeumo 10.2
MID vs MUN · 7.9m 92%
Value
1.29
Pts
4.4
xGI
0.77
Own
21%
Mins
450
  1. TOT (H)
  2. LEE (A)
  3. BOU (H)
DEF vs ARS · 8.0m 92%
Value
1.25
Pts
4.3
xGI
0.14
Own
23%
Mins
450
  1. LEE (H)
  2. NFO (A)
  3. EVE (H)
GKP vs ARS · 6.1m 92%
Value
1.58
Pts
4.1
xGI
0.00
Own
42%
Mins
450
  1. LEE (H)
  2. NFO (A)
  3. EVE (H)
MID vs BRE · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.93
Pts
4.0
xGI
0.20
Own
2.5%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
7 Pascal Groß 9.6
MID vs BHA · 5.8m 92%
Value
1.66
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.52
Own
29%
Mins
450
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
8 Granit Xhaka 9.5
MID vs SUN · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.72
Pts
4.0
xGI
0.27
Own
3.6%
Mins
450
  1. BHA (H)
  2. BOU (A)
  3. LEE (H)
DEF vs EVE · 6.2m 92%
Value
1.53
Pts
3.9
xGI
0.05
Own
17%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
MID vs NFO · 8.0m 92%
Value
1.17
Pts
3.9
xGI
0.59
Own
16%
Mins
450
  1. CRY (A)
  2. ARS (H)
  3. IPS (A)
DEF vs BOU · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.87
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.23
Own
0.4%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
GKP vs LEE · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.83
Pts
3.7
xGI
0.00
Own
5.5%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
GKP vs HUL · 4.7m 92%
Value
1.93
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.00
Own
13%
Mins
450
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
14 Senne Lammens 8.9
GKP vs MUN · 4.9m 92%
Value
1.82
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.00
Own
9.9%
Mins
450
  1. TOT (H)
  2. LEE (A)
  3. BOU (H)
DEF vs LEE · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.77
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.11
Own
4.3%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
16 Sven Botman 8.8
DEF vs NEW · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.76
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.04
Own
0.7%
Mins
450
  1. COV (A)
  2. AVL (H)
  3. CRY (A)
DEF vs CRY · 4.9m 92%
Value
1.78
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.03
Own
0.6%
Mins
450
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
GKP vs LIV · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.58
Pts
3.6
xGI
0.00
Own
4.1%
Mins
450
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
DEF vs EVE · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.58
Pts
3.6
xGI
0.03
Own
2.4%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
MID vs EVE · 6.6m 92%
Value
1.30
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.37
Own
6.0%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
21 Ethan Ampadu 8.5
MID vs LEE · 5.4m 92%
Value
1.58
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.07
Own
0.9%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
DEF vs BRE · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.88
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.05
Own
3.9%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
23 Marc Guéhi 8.4
DEF vs MCI · 6.0m 92%
Value
1.40
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.27
Own
18%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
24 Bernd Leno 8.4
GKP vs FUL · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.87
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.00
Own
3.4%
Mins
450
  1. IPS (A)
  2. HUL (H)
  3. COV (A)
GKP vs MCI · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.52
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.00
Own
7.6%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
26 James Hill 8.3
DEF vs BOU · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.51
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.16
Own
0.8%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
27 Harvey Barnes 8.3
MID vs NEW · 6.1m 92%
Value
1.35
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.22
Own
5.7%
Mins
450
  1. COV (A)
  2. AVL (H)
  3. CRY (A)
DEF vs LIV · 6.5m 92%
Value
1.26
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.07
Own
16%
Mins
450
  1. MCI (H)
  2. BRE (A)
  3. BHA (H)
GKP vs BRE · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.64
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.00
Own
6.1%
Mins
450
  1. AVL (A)
  2. LIV (H)
  3. HUL (A)
GKP vs EVE · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.47
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.00
Own
9.1%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
DEF vs BOU · 5.4m 92%
Value
1.49
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.08
Own
3.0%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
32 James Justin 8.0
DEF vs LEE · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.78
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.12
Own
1.4%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
GKP vs COV · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.76
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.8%
Mins
450
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
34 Harry Maguire 7.9
DEF vs MUN · 4.8m 92%
Value
1.65
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.13
Own
8.6%
Mins
450
  1. TOT (H)
  2. LEE (A)
  3. BOU (H)
35 Leif Davis 7.8
DEF vs IPS · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.96
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.41
Own
6.9%
Mins
450
  1. FUL (H)
  2. MCI (A)
  3. NFO (H)
GKP vs BHA · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.74
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.04
Own
22%
Mins
450
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
37 Dara O'Shea 7.8
DEF vs IPS · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.95
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.06
Own
2.7%
Mins
450
  1. FUL (H)
  2. MCI (A)
  3. NFO (H)
38 Matz Sels 7.8
GKP vs NFO · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.55
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.00
Own
1.6%
Mins
450
  1. CRY (A)
  2. ARS (H)
  3. IPS (A)
GKP vs NEW · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.55
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.00
Own
1.5%
Mins
450
  1. COV (A)
  2. AVL (H)
  3. CRY (A)
GKP vs BOU · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.70
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.00
Own
3.0%
Mins
450
  1. CHE (A)
  2. SUN (H)
  3. MUN (A)
GKP vs TOT · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.70
Pts
2.9
xGI
0.00
Own
17%
Mins
450
  1. MUN (A)
  2. COV (H)
  3. CHE (A)
42 Malick Thiaw 7.6
DEF vs NEW · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.51
Pts
3.0
xGI
0.02
Own
2.2%
Mins
450
  1. COV (A)
  2. AVL (H)
  3. CRY (A)
DEF vs EVE · 4.6m 92%
Value
1.64
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.04
Own
4.2%
Mins
450
  1. HUL (A)
  2. CHE (H)
  3. ARS (A)
44 Neco Williams 7.5
DEF vs NFO · 5.0m 92%
Value
1.50
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.20
Own
8.7%
Mins
450
  1. CRY (A)
  2. ARS (H)
  3. IPS (A)
45 Issa Diop 7.5
DEF vs IPS · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.87
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.04
Own
13%
Mins
450
  1. FUL (H)
  2. MCI (A)
  3. NFO (H)
46 Rúben Dias 7.2
DEF vs MCI · 5.5m 92%
Value
1.31
Pts
2.7
xGI
0.21
Own
1.9%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
47 Robin Roefs 7.2
GKP vs SUN · 4.9m 92%
Value
1.47
Pts
2.9
xGI
0.00
Own
2.4%
Mins
450
  1. BHA (H)
  2. BOU (A)
  3. LEE (H)
48 Calvin Bassey 6.9
DEF vs FUL · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.53
Pts
2.6
xGI
0.05
Own
0.7%
Mins
450
  1. IPS (A)
  2. HUL (H)
  3. COV (A)
DEF vs AVL · 4.5m 92%
Value
1.52
Pts
2.9
xGI
0.12
Own
0.3%
Mins
450
  1. BRE (H)
  2. NEW (A)
  3. MCI (H)
50 Antoine Semenyo ! 6.2
MID vs MCI · 8.4m 69%
Value
0.74
Pts
2.4
xGI
0.30
Own
15%
Mins
450
  1. LIV (A)
  2. IPS (H)
  3. AVL (A)
51 Daniel Ballard ! 5.7
DEF vs SUN · 4.9m 69%
Value
1.17
Pts
2.3
xGI
0.09
Own
2.5%
Mins
450
  1. BHA (H)
  2. BOU (A)
  3. LEE (H)
DEF vs TOT · 4.9m 69%
Value
1.17
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.22
Own
6.5%
Mins
450
  1. MUN (A)
  2. COV (H)
  3. CHE (A)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 3 weights sum to 2.44, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.