xgEdge

KRC Genk's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 4 of 4 matching results

7 played this season

Reset filters

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
0 wins, 2 draws, 2 losses

2 pts 5–9 goals −4 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
4.20 – 5.19
1.05 – 1.30 per match
xGD
-0.99
-0.25 per match
xG record
0 with the chances, 2 with even chances, 2 against them

Small sample: 4 matches.

Comparable xG: 4 of 4 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

2 pts 4.5 xPts

−2.5 vs xPts

Small sample: 4 matches.

Matched xPts: 4 of 4 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · All competitions · Away

KRC Genk's winless run sits behind chances that argue for more. They out-created the opponent in 1 of 4 matches, for −0.99 xG difference overall on 4.20–5.19. Their points total of 2 sits 2.5 below the model's 4.5 xPts, so the chances have clearly outrun the results.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 4 results KRC Genk are 2.48 points below their xPts.

Points
2
xPts
4.48
Gap
-2.48
Sun 09/08 Sat 22/08 Sun 06/09 Sun 20/09 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 -1.31 -1.27 -1.21 -2.48 -1.31 +0.04 +0.06 -1.27 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
KRC Genk: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sun 09/08 SV Zulte Waregem 0 1.31 -1.31 -1.31
Sat 22/08 Royal Antwerp FC 1 0.96 +0.04 -1.27
Sun 06/09 RSC Anderlecht 1 0.94 +0.06 -1.21
Sun 20/09 Club Brugge KV 0 1.27 -1.27 -2.48

Scores and xG

KRC Genk first

  • Away Jupiler Pro League Loss with even chances

    xG 1.96

    xGA 2.12

    xGD -0.16

    0:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Club Brugge KV, Sun 20/09

    The team lost, while the chance difference was approximately even. The outcome was weaker than that difference alone suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.27
    Points minus xPts
    -1.27

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Jupiler Pro League Draw against the chances

    xG 0.40

    xGA 0.70

    xGD -0.30

    0:0 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · RSC Anderlecht, Sun 06/09

    The match was drawn although the team recorded less xG. The outcome was stronger than that chance difference suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    0.94
    Points minus xPts
    +0.06

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Jupiler Pro League Draw against the chances

    xG 1.30

    xGA 1.86

    xGD -0.56

    4:4 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Royal Antwerp FC, Sat 22/08

    The match was drawn although the team recorded less xG. The outcome was stronger than that chance difference suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    0.96
    Points minus xPts
    +0.04

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Jupiler Pro League Loss with even chances

    xG 0.54

    xGA 0.51

    xGD +0.03

    1:2 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · SV Zulte Waregem, Sun 09/08

    The team lost, while the chance difference was approximately even. The outcome was weaker than that difference alone suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.31
    Points minus xPts
    -1.31

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →