xgEdge

Ligue 1 table 2025/2026

Ligue 1 clubs ranked by expected points (xPts) in 2025/2026, with the points each actually took beside them. Paris Saint-Germain top both the table and expected points, on 71.51 xPts.

Ligue 1 2025/2026 table ranked on expected points
# restore the table order Move sort descending Team P sort descending W sort descending D sort descending L sort descending GF sort descending GA sort descending GD sort descending Pts sort descending xG sort descending xGA sort descending xGD sort descending xPts sort descending Pts vs xPts sort descending
1 Same place as in the actual table PSG 34 24 4 6 74 29 +45 76 69.75 31.59 +38.16 71.51 +4.49
2 Same place as in the actual table RCL 34 22 4 8 66 35 +31 70 67.37 43.38 +23.99 61.68 +8.32
3 Same place as in the actual table LIL 34 18 7 9 52 37 +15 61 54.85 36.77 +18.08 58.47 +2.53
4 Up 1 place against the actual table MAR 34 18 5 11 63 45 +18 59 60.96 46.20 +14.76 56.38 +2.62
5 Down 1 place against the actual table LYO 34 18 6 10 53 40 +13 60 51.41 43.87 +7.54 52.09 +7.91
6 Up 1 place against the actual table ASM 34 16 6 12 60 54 +6 54 56.82 48.74 +8.08 51.51 +2.49
7 Up 1 place against the actual table RCS 34 15 8 11 58 47 +11 53 52.86 45.70 +7.16 50.06 +2.94
8 Down 2 places against the actual table REN 34 17 8 9 59 50 +9 59 54.33 53.27 +1.06 48.36 +10.64
9 Up 1 place against the actual table TFC 33 12 8 13 47 46 +1 44 42.83 42.69 +0.14 45.90 −1.90
10 Down 1 place against the actual table LOR 34 11 12 11 48 51 −3 45 45.47 45.81 −0.34 45.87 −0.87
11 Up 1 place against the actual table BRE 34 10 9 15 43 55 −12 39 44.76 50.15 −5.39 44.88 −5.88
12 Down 1 place against the actual table PFC 34 11 11 12 47 50 −3 44 45.20 55.42 −10.22 41.28 +2.72
13 Up 2 places against the actual table HAC 34 7 14 13 32 44 −12 35 38.05 51.57 −13.52 39.28 −4.28
14 Up 2 places against the actual table AUX 34 8 10 16 34 44 −10 34 35.44 47.89 −12.45 38.47 −4.47
15 Down 1 place against the actual table NIC 36 8 12 16 41 61 −20 36 43.39* 58.07 −14.68 38.44 −6.44
16 Up 1 place against the actual table NAN 33 5 8 20 29 52 −23 23 35.93 47.20 −11.27 36.91 −13.91
17 Down 4 places against the actual table ANG 34 9 9 16 29 48 −19 36 32.33 55.69 −23.36 31.58 +4.42
18 Same place as in the actual table MET 34 3 8 23 32 76 −44 17 34.78 62.52 −27.74 30.12 −13.12
19 Up 2 places against the actual table RSF 1 0 0 1 2 3 −1 0 — — — — —
20 Down 1 place against the actual table ROD 2 1 1 0 3 2 +1 4 — — — — —
21 Down 1 place against the actual table STE 3 0 2 1 1 4 −3 2 — — — — —
  • More points than xPts
  • Fewer points than xPts

Ranked by xPts. ▲ / ▼ beside the rank shows how far a club sits above or below its place in the actual table.

  • xG is available for 34 of 36 matches for Nice.
  • xG is available for 0 of 2 matches for Rodez AF.
  • xG is available for 0 of 3 matches for Saint-Étienne.
  • xG is available for 0 of 1 matches for Red Star FC.
  • For those clubs the expected columns count only the matches with xG, and Pts vs xPts sets their expected points against the points from those same matches.
How to read this table
xG
Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a club took. A chance scored nine times in ten is worth 0.9.
xGA
Expected goals against: the same measure for the shots a club allowed.
xGD
xG minus xGA: how far a club's chances outweighed its opponents', or the other way round.
xPts
Expected points: the points a club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average. Each match's two xG figures become chances of a win, a draw and a loss, and a win is worth 3 and a draw 1.
Pts vs xPts
Actual points minus expected points based on match xG. Positive, drawn in green, is more points than the chances were worth on average; negative, in red, is fewer. It measures the gap and says nothing about its cause.
npxG
Non-penalty xG: xG with penalties removed, offered where the competition's figures support it. It changes xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is always worked out from all xG.

Expected points are read off the same score matrix that prices the board: each played match's two xG totals are taken as scoring rates, and the team's share is 3 × P(win) + 1 × P(draw), summed over the season. Understat arrives at the same figure by simulating each shot, which needs per-shot data, held here for %{competitions}. Passes per defensive action and deep completions are not shown because no source here ingests the event data behind them.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →