NB I (Hungary) table 2025/2026
- Leader ETO FC Győr 69 pts
- Most above xPts Debreceni VSC +14.45 against expected points
- Most below xPts Diósgyőri VTK −11.57 against expected points
The same clubs ranked on expected points — what each club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
| # restore the table order | Move sort descending | Team | P sort descending | W sort descending | D sort descending | L sort descending | GF sort descending | GA sort descending | GD sort descending | Pts sort descending | xG sort descending | xGA sort descending | xGD sort descending | xPts sort descending | Pts vs xPts sort descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Up 1 place against the actual table | Ferencváros TC FER | 33 | 21 | 5 | 7 | 67 | 31 | +36 | 68 | 70.44 | 31.97 | +38.47 | 69.15 | −1.15 |
| 2 | Down 1 place against the actual table | ETO FC Győr ETO | 33 | 20 | 9 | 4 | 65 | 30 | +35 | 69 | 62.43* | 36.88 | +25.55 | 59.08 | +3.92 |
| 3 | Same place as in the actual table | Paksi FC PAK | 33 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 63 | 46 | +17 | 53 | 70.58 | 55.37 | +15.21 | 53.38 | −0.38 |
| 4 | Up 4 places against the actual table | Nyiregyháza Spartacus NYI | 33 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 47 | 57 | −10 | 40 | 48.92 | 49.16 | −0.24 | 45.99 | −5.99 |
| 5 | Same place as in the actual table | Zalaegerszegi TE ZAL | 33 | 13 | 9 | 11 | 49 | 43 | +6 | 48 | 48.42 | 48.12 | +0.30 | 45.57 | +2.43 |
| 6 | Up 4 places against the actual table | MTK Budapest MTK | 33 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 55 | 62 | −7 | 38 | 51.78* | 55.20 | −3.42 | 43.55 | −5.55 |
| 7 | Same place as in the actual table | Újpest ÚJP | 33 | 11 | 7 | 15 | 48 | 57 | −9 | 40 | 48.05 | 52.36 | −4.31 | 43.01 | −3.01 |
| 8 | Down 2 places against the actual table | Puskás Akadémia PUS | 33 | 13 | 7 | 13 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 46 | 46.36* | 52.97 | −6.61 | 41.55 | +1.45 |
| 9 | Up 2 places against the actual table | Diósgyőri VTK DIÓ | 33 | 6 | 10 | 17 | 39 | 65 | −26 | 28 | 50.23 | 60.54 | −10.31 | 39.57 | −11.57 |
| 10 | Down 6 places against the actual table | Debreceni VSC DEB | 33 | 14 | 11 | 8 | 51 | 41 | +10 | 53 | 42.72* | 52.73 | −10.01 | 37.55 | +14.45 |
| 11 | Down 2 places against the actual table | Kisvárda FC KIS | 33 | 11 | 7 | 15 | 36 | 49 | −13 | 40 | 36.29* | 46.02 | −9.73 | 37.39 | +1.61 |
| 12 | Same place as in the actual table | Kazincbarcikai SC KAZ | 33 | 6 | 4 | 23 | 31 | 70 | −39 | 22 | 34.86* | 69.76 | −34.90 | 24.10 | −2.10 |
- More points than xPts
- Fewer points than xPts
Ranked by xPts. ▲ / ▼ beside the rank shows how far a club sits above or below its place in the actual table.
- xG is available for 31 of 33 matches for ETO FC Győr.
- xG is available for 32 of 33 matches for Debreceni VSC.
- xG is available for 32 of 33 matches for Puskás Akadémia.
- xG is available for 32 of 33 matches for Kisvárda FC.
- xG is available for 32 of 33 matches for MTK Budapest.
- xG is available for 31 of 33 matches for Kazincbarcikai SC.
- For those clubs the expected columns count only the matches with xG, and Pts vs xPts sets their expected points against the points from those same matches.
How to read this table
- xG
- Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a club took. A chance scored nine times in ten is worth 0.9.
- xGA
- Expected goals against: the same measure for the shots a club allowed.
- xGD
- xG minus xGA: how far a club's chances outweighed its opponents', or the other way round.
- xPts
- Expected points: the points a club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average. Each match's two xG figures become chances of a win, a draw and a loss, and a win is worth 3 and a draw 1.
- Pts vs xPts
- Actual points minus expected points based on match xG. Positive, drawn in green, is more points than the chances were worth on average; negative, in red, is fewer. It measures the gap and says nothing about its cause.
- npxG
- Non-penalty xG: xG with penalties removed, offered where the competition's figures support it. It changes xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is always worked out from all xG.
Expected points are read off the same score matrix that prices the board: each played match's two xG totals are taken as scoring rates, and the team's share is 3 × P(win) + 1 × P(draw), summed over the season. Understat arrives at the same figure by simulating each shot, which needs per-shot data, held here for %{competitions}. Passes per defensive action and deep completions are not shown because no source here ingests the event data behind them.