xgEdge

Serie A xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every Serie A club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from the expected-goal columns; goals, G − xG and the rates taken from goals are unchanged.

Roma lead on expected-goal difference, +1.61 a match over 5 matches with xG. Lecce sit at the foot on −1.43 a match.

  • Best attack

    2.83 Inter

    14.13 xG in 5 matches

  • Best defence

    0.45 Juventus

    2.27 xGA in 5 matches

  • Widest xG difference

    +1.61 Roma

    +8.06 xGD in 5 matches

Attack and defence

Serie A: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Roma ROM Inter Juventus JUV Como Monza Sassuolo Fiorentina Napoli Lazio Milan Bologna Frosinone Genoa Torino Udinese Venezia Cagliari Parma Atalanta Lecce LEC
Every Serie A club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
ROM 2.64 1.02 +1.61
INT 2.83 1.28 +1.55
JUV 1.52 0.45 +1.07
COM 1.93 1.36 +0.57
MON 1.59 1.09 +0.50
SAS 1.55 1.09 +0.46
FIO 1.68 1.34 +0.34
NAP 1.52 1.21 +0.31
LAZ 1.37 1.07 +0.30
MIL 1.39 1.13 +0.26
BOL 1.20 0.97 +0.23
FRO 1.43 1.87 −0.44
GEN 0.75 1.22 −0.47
TOR 0.89 1.40 −0.51
UDI 1.22 1.89 −0.67
VEN 1.40 2.13 −0.73
CAG 0.85 1.68 −0.83
PAR 0.67 1.70 −1.03
ATA 0.70 1.79 −1.08
LEC 0.92 2.35 −1.43
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

Non-penalty xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Serie A xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P npxG npxGA npxGD npxGD/match Pts
1 ROM 5 13.18 5.12 +8.06 +1.61 13
2 INT 5 14.13 6.38 +7.75 +1.55 13
3 JUV 5 7.62 2.27 +5.35 +1.07 10
4 COM 5 9.66 6.82 +2.84 +0.57 10
5 MON 5 7.95 5.44 +2.51 +0.50 4
6 SAS 5 7.75 5.47 +2.28 +0.46 7
7 FIO 5 8.39 6.68 +1.71 +0.34 4
8 NAP 5 7.61 6.05 +1.56 +0.31 7
9 LAZ 5 6.85 5.37 +1.48 +0.30 13
10 MIL 5 6.95 5.66 +1.29 +0.26 11
11 BOL 5 6.00 4.86 +1.14 +0.23 2
12 FRO 5 7.16 9.36 −2.20 −0.44 10
13 GEN 5 3.73 6.10 −2.37 −0.47 1
14 TOR 5 4.46 6.99 −2.53 −0.51 4
15 UDI 5 6.10 9.46 −3.36 −0.67 4
16 VEN 5 7.01 10.66 −3.65 −0.73 0
17 CAG 5 4.24 8.40 −4.16 −0.83 12
18 PAR 5 3.36 8.51 −5.15 −1.03 4
19 ATA 5 3.51 8.93 −5.42 −1.08 6
20 LEC 5 4.61 11.74 −7.13 −1.43 6

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
npxG
— Non-penalty expected goals: xG with penalties removed
npxGA
— Non-penalty expected goals against: xGA with penalties removed
npxGD
— npxG minus npxGA
npxGD/match
— npxG minus npxGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →