xgEdge

Sunday, 30/08/2026 at 20:00

Full time
Match report · SuperLiga (Romania)

FCSB 1:3 UTA Arad

FCSB Home 1.45 xG
UTA Arad Away 1.08 xG
13 The result went against the chances

FCSB were the model's likeliest winner before kick-off at 54%. UTA Arad won 3–1. The biggest difference was FCSB's attack: 1.45 xG against 1.88 projected (−0.43).

The model against the result

priced before kick-off
FCSB
54%
Draw
26%
UTA Arad
20% What happened

Data coverage Both teams have the full 20-match model window available.

Projected vs produced

Expected goals
FCSB The model projected 1.88 Produced 1.45 Difference -0.43
UTA Arad The model projected 1.15 Produced 1.08 Difference -0.07

FCSB produced 0.43 xG less than projected

Projected before kick-off Produced on the night

The shots behind it

FCSB UTA Arad
Shots
18
8
On target
6
5
Inside the box
12
5
xG per shot
0.08
0.14

Recent form

Last 6 · xG per match
FCSB

2.13 xG created 1.39 xGA

  • W 1.90 created, 1.86 conceded against FC Argeș Pitești
  • W 1.76 created, 0.26 conceded against FK Csíkszereda Miercurea Ciuc
  • D 4.29 created, 1.97 conceded against FC Farul Constanța
  • D 0.72 created, 1.31 conceded against Sepsi OSK
  • W 2.37 created, 1.38 conceded against FC Botoșani
  • L 1.74 created, 1.54 conceded against CFR 1907 Cluj
UTA Arad

2.04 xG created 1.30 xGA

  • W 3.82 created, 2.00 conceded against AFC Unirea 04 Slobozia
  • D 2.25 created, 0.37 conceded against SC Oțelul Galați
  • L 1.51 created, 0.79 conceded against FC Voluntari
  • D 0.84 created, 1.05 conceded against FC Rapid București
  • L 2.47 created, 2.30 conceded against FC Universitatea Cluj
  • D 1.35 created, 1.29 conceded against FC Corvinul Hunedoara

xG created xG conceded (xGA) W / D / L: the match result

Head to head

FCSB: 3 won · 0 drawn · 0 lost

Pre-match model & market record

6 opportunities flagged6 won0 lost

  • Won
  • Won
  • Won
  • Won
  • Won
  • Won
View pre-match record
The outcomes the model flagged on FCSB against UTA Arad before kick-off, in the order they ranked, with the price, the edge and what became of each.
Selection Price Edge Result
UTA Arad 2+ goals 3.75 +21.0% Won
Both teams to score 1.80 +9.1% Won
UTA Arad to score 1.53 +9.0% Won
UTA Arad to win 5.50 +6.7% Won
Over 1.5 goals 1.20 +1.0% Won
Over 2.5 goals 1.67 +0.2% Won

Pre-match model vs market

Outcome Model Market Difference Fair odds
FCSB 53.6% 60.3% −6.8 pp 1.87
Draw 26.1% 23.2% +2.9 pp 3.83
UTA Arad 20.3% 16.5% +3.9 pp 4.92

Other markets

Outcome Model Market Difference Fair odds
FCSB to score 86.9% 85.4% +1.5 pp 1.15
FCSB not to score 13.1% 14.6% −1.5 pp 7.61
UTA Arad to score 71.1% 60.8% +10.3 pp 1.41
UTA Arad not to score 28.9% 39.2% −10.3 pp 3.46
Both teams to score 63.2% 51.5% +11.7 pp 1.58
Both teams not to score 36.8% 48.5% −11.7 pp 2.72
FCSB 2+ goals 58.0% 58.9% −0.9 pp 1.72
FCSB at most 1 goal 42.0% 41.1% +0.9 pp 2.38
UTA Arad 2+ goals 32.3% 25.0% +7.3 pp 3.10
UTA Arad at most 1 goal 67.7% 75.0% −7.3 pp 1.48
Over 1.5 goals 84.2% 78.3% +5.9 pp 1.19
Under 1.5 goals 15.8% 21.7% −5.9 pp 6.33
Over 2.5 goals 60.1% 56.3% +3.8 pp 1.66
Under 2.5 goals 39.9% 43.7% −3.8 pp 2.51

Prices and probabilities are the ones stored before kick-off; nothing here is recalculated. Edge is the model's probability times the price, minus one, so a flagged outcome that lost is the ordinary case rather than a contradiction.

Model details

Show
Fit window
the last 20 matches, recency weighted (a match 107 days old counts half)
FCSB sample
20 matches
UTA Arad sample
20 matches
Computed
1 day before kick-off
Prices taken
10 hours before kick-off

Limitations

The model reads expected goals and nothing else. It does not know the lineups, who is injured or suspended, what either side has to play for, the weather, or how congested the schedule around this match is.