xgEdge

Bundesliga expected points table 2026/2027

Every Bundesliga club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

FC Bayern München lead on expected points with 11.04 over 4 matches with xG. That is 1.66 clear of Bayer 04 Leverkusen. FC Augsburg sit 8 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 4 against 12 on expected points. TSG Hoffenheim sit 7 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 14 against 7 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
Bundesliga: table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: Bayer 04 Leverkusen (5 in the table, 2 on xPts), Borussia Dortmund (1 in the table, 4 on xPts), RB Leipzig (9 in the table, 5 on xPts), TSG Hoffenheim (14 in the table, 7 on xPts), 1. FC Köln (13 in the table, 8 on xPts), VfB Stuttgart (15 in the table, 11 on xPts), FC Augsburg (4 in the table, 12 on xPts), SV 07 Elversberg (7 in the table, 13 on xPts), FC Schalke 04 (11 in the table, 14 on xPts), Borussia M'gladbach (18 in the table, 15 on xPts), and SC Paderborn 07 (12 in the table, 16 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

Bundesliga expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 FCB 4 10 11.04 −1.04 2 1 place below its expected-points rank
2 B04 4 7 9.37 −2.37 5 3 places below its expected-points rank
3 SCF 4 10 9.04 +0.96 3 Same place as on expected points
4 BVB 4 12 7.80 +4.20 1 3 places above its expected-points rank
5 RBL 4 6 7.41 −1.41 9 4 places below its expected-points rank
6 M05 4 7 7.27 −0.27 6 Same place as on expected points
7 TSG 4 3 5.91 −2.91 14 7 places below its expected-points rank
8 KOE 4 4 5.61 −1.61 13 5 places below its expected-points rank
9 SGE 4 5 5.45 −0.45 10 1 place below its expected-points rank
10 SVW 4 7 4.62 +2.38 8 2 places above its expected-points rank
11 VFB 4 3 4.03 −1.03 15 4 places below its expected-points rank
12 FCA 4 7 3.97 +3.03 4 8 places above its expected-points rank
13 SVE 4 7 3.93 +3.07 7 6 places above its expected-points rank
14 S04 4 5 3.67 +1.33 11 3 places above its expected-points rank
15 BMG 4 0 3.30 −3.30 18 3 places below its expected-points rank
16 SCP 4 4 2.87 +1.13 12 4 places above its expected-points rank
17 HSV 4 3 2.83 +0.17 16 1 place above its expected-points rank
18 FCU 4 1 2.78 −1.78 17 1 place above its expected-points rank
  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →