xgEdge

Results

AFC Ajax results 2026/2027

AFC Ajax · Eredivisie 2026/2027 →

AFC Ajax's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 4 of 4 matching results

7 played this season

Reset filters

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
1 win, 2 draws, 1 loss

5 pts 10–8 goals +2 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
10.29 – 6.31
2.57 – 1.58 per match
xGD
+3.98
+1.00 per match
xG record
3 with the chances, 0 with even chances, 1 against them

Small sample: 4 matches.

Comparable xG: 4 of 4 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

5 pts 7.9 xPts

−2.9 vs xPts

Small sample: 4 matches.

Matched xPts: 4 of 4 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · All competitions · Home

AFC Ajax's mixed record sits behind chances that argue for more. They out-created the opponent in 3 of 4 matches, for +3.98 xG difference overall on 10.29–6.31. Their points total of 5 sits 2.9 below the model's 7.9 xPts, so the chances have clearly outrun the results.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 4 results AFC Ajax are 2.94 points below their xPts.

Points
5
xPts
7.94
Gap
-2.94
Sun 16/08 Sat 05/09 Tue 15/09 Sat 19/09 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 -0.84 -1.88 -1.43 -2.94 -0.84 -1.04 +0.45 -1.51 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
AFC Ajax: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sun 16/08 SC Heerenveen 1 1.84 -0.84 -0.84
Sat 05/09 PSV Eindhoven 0 1.04 -1.04 -1.88
Tue 15/09 Willem II Tilburg 3 2.55 +0.45 -1.43
Sat 19/09 Excelsior 1 2.51 -1.51 -2.94

Scores and xG

AFC Ajax first

  • Home Eredivisie Draw against the chances

    xG 2.51

    xGA 0.82

    xGD +1.69

    2:2 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Excelsior, Sat 19/09

    The match was drawn although the team recorded a positive xG difference. The outcome was weaker than that chance advantage suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    2.51
    Points minus xPts
    -1.51

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Eredivisie Win backed by the chances

    xG 3.79

    xGA 1.58

    xGD +2.21

    5:1 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Willem II Tilburg, Tue 15/09

    The team won and had a positive xG difference. The chances support the direction of the result, without making a judgment about fairness.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    2.55
    Points minus xPts
    +0.45

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Eredivisie Loss backed by the chances

    xG 1.99

    xGA 2.55

    xGD -0.56

    1:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · PSV Eindhoven, Sat 05/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.04
    Points minus xPts
    -1.04

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Eredivisie Draw against the chances

    xG 2.00

    xGA 1.36

    xGD +0.64

    2:2 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · SC Heerenveen, Sun 16/08

    The match was drawn although the team recorded a positive xG difference. The outcome was weaker than that chance advantage suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    1.84
    Points minus xPts
    -0.84

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →