xgEdge

Results

Erzurumspor FK results 2026/2027

Erzurumspor FK · Süper Lig 2026/2027 →

Erzurumspor FK's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 6 of 6 matching results

6 played this season

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
2 wins, 1 draw, 3 losses

7 pts 3–11 goals −8 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
4.03 – 9.54
0.67 – 1.59 per match
xGD
-5.51
-0.92 per match
xG record
1 with the chances, 1 with even chances, 4 against them

Comparable xG: 6 of 6 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

7 pts 4.9 xPts

+2.1 vs xPts

Matched xPts: 6 of 6 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · All competitions · All venues

Erzurumspor FK's mixed record runs ahead of the chances they created and conceded. They out-created the opponent in 2 of 6 matches, for −5.51 xG difference overall on 4.03–9.54. Their points total of 7 sits 2.1 above the model's 4.9 xPts, so the results have clearly outrun the chances.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 6 results Erzurumspor FK are 2.10 points above their xPts.

Points
7
xPts
4.90
Gap
+2.10
Sun 16/08 Fri 21/08 Fri 28/08 Sat 05/09 Fri 11/09 Sun 20/09 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 -0.33 -0.43 -0.83 +1.06 +0.80 +2.10 -0.33 -0.10 -0.40 +1.89 -0.26 +1.30 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
Erzurumspor FK: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sun 16/08 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 0 0.33 -0.33 -0.33
Fri 21/08 Galatasaray 0 0.10 -0.10 -0.43
Fri 28/08 Gençlerbirliği 1 1.40 -0.40 -0.83
Sat 05/09 Konyaspor 3 1.11 +1.89 +1.06
Fri 11/09 Beşiktaş 0 0.26 -0.26 +0.80
Sun 20/09 Samsunspor 3 1.70 +1.30 +2.10

Scores and xG

Erzurumspor FK first

  • Home Süper Lig Win backed by the chances

    xG 0.72

    xGA 0.36

    xGD +0.36

    1:0 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Samsunspor, Sun 20/09

    The team won and had a positive xG difference. The chances support the direction of the result, without making a judgment about fairness.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    1.70
    Points minus xPts
    +1.30

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Süper Lig Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.50

    xGA 2.29

    xGD -1.79

    0:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Beşiktaş, Fri 11/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.26
    Points minus xPts
    -0.26

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Süper Lig Win against the chances

    xG 1.24

    xGA 1.56

    xGD -0.32

    1:0 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Konyaspor, Sat 05/09

    The team won despite recording less xG than its opponent. That contrast does not make the win impossible or establish why it happened.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    1.11
    Points minus xPts
    +1.89

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Süper Lig Draw with even chances

    xG 0.86

    xGA 0.75

    xGD +0.11

    1:1 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Gençlerbirliği, Fri 28/08

    The match was drawn and the chance difference was approximately even. The two readings broadly align.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    1.41
    Points minus xPts
    -0.41

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Süper Lig Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.48

    xGA 3.08

    xGD -2.60

    0:4 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Galatasaray, Fri 21/08

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.10
    Points minus xPts
    -0.10

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Süper Lig Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.23

    xGA 1.50

    xGD -1.27

    0:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Amed Sportif Faaliyetler, Sun 16/08

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.33
    Points minus xPts
    -0.33

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Biggest overperformance

Konyaspor 1:0

· Home xG / xGA 1.24 – 1.56

Goal difference
+1
xGD
-0.32
GD minus xGD
+1.32

Among 6 comparable results.

Open match →

Biggest underperformance

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 0:3

· Away xG / xGA 0.23 – 1.50

Goal difference
-3
xGD
-1.27
GD minus xGD
-1.73

Among 6 comparable results.

Open match →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →