Sunday, 13/09/2026 at 14:00
Full timeSilkeborg IF 1:1 Viborg FF
Viborg FF were the model's likeliest winner before kick-off at 47%. It finished 1–1. The biggest difference was Viborg FF's attack: 0.71 xG against 1.58 projected (−0.87).
Goals
- 11' Lucas Riisgaard Silkeborg IF · 0.12 xG chance 1–0
- 56' Asker Beck Viborg FF · 0.10 xG chance 1–1
The model against the result
- Silkeborg IF
- 24%
- Draw
- 29% What happened
- Viborg FF
- 47%
Data coverage Both teams have the full 20-match model window available.
Projected vs produced
Viborg FF produced 0.87 xG less than projected
Projected before kick-off Produced on the night
The shots behind it
- Shots
- 13
- 10
- On target
- 5
- 4
- Inside the box
- 9
- 5
- xG per shot
- 0.08
- 0.07
- Open play xG
- 0.63
- 0.52
- Set-piece xG
- 0.47
- 0.14
- Penalties
- —
- —
Shot-level xG may differ from the published match total
The provider publishes the match total separately from its shot-by-shot values. Those values are rounded to two decimals and, leaving out penalties and own goals, add up to its non-penalty xG: 1.09 for Silkeborg IF and 0.66 for Viborg FF.
Shot map
Both teams shown attacking the same goal for comparison.
All shots
23 shots · 1.76 xG
Hover, focus or tap a shot to read it.
- Silkeborg IF
- Viborg FF
- Filled = goal
- Dot area = xG (the smallest chances drawn at a minimum size)
Recent form
1.17 xG created 1.93 xGA
- L 1.52 created, 1.20 conceded against FC København
- W 1.92 created, 1.14 conceded against Odense Boldklub
- L 0.22 created, 2.70 conceded against FC Nordsjælland
- L 0.99 created, 2.14 conceded against Brøndby IF
- D 1.11 created, 2.50 conceded against FC Midtjylland
- D 1.23 created, 1.92 conceded against AGF
1.51 xG created 1.10 xGA
xG created xG conceded (xGA) W / D / L: the match result
Head to head
Pre-match model & market record
7 opportunities flagged4 won3 lost
- Won
- Won
- Lost
- Won
- Lost
- Lost
- Won
View pre-match record Hide pre-match record
| Selection | Price | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Draw | 4.00 | +17.5% | Won |
| Under 2.5 goals | 2.40 | +15.9% | Won |
| Under 1.5 goals | 5.50 | +15.1% | Lost |
| Viborg FF at most 1 goal | 2.20 | +13.8% | Won |
| Viborg FF not to score | 6.00 | +9.1% | Lost |
| Both teams not to score | 2.50 | +2.4% | Lost |
| Silkeborg IF at most 1 goal | 1.44 | +0.1% | Won |
Pre-match model vs market
| Outcome | Model | Market | Difference | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silkeborg IF | 23.9% | 24.1% | −0.3 pp | 4.19 |
| Draw | 29.4% | 23.5% | +5.8 pp | 3.40 |
| Viborg FF | 46.7% | 52.3% | −5.6 pp | 2.14 |
Other markets
| Outcome | Model | Market | Difference | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silkeborg IF to score | 70.1% | 70.9% | −0.8 pp | 1.43 |
| Silkeborg IF not to score | 29.9% | 29.1% | +0.8 pp | 3.34 |
| Viborg FF to score | 81.8% | 84.2% | −2.4 pp | 1.22 |
| Viborg FF not to score | 18.2% | 15.8% | +2.4 pp | 5.50 |
| Both teams to score | 59.0% | 62.5% | −3.5 pp | 1.69 |
| Both teams not to score | 41.0% | 37.5% | +3.5 pp | 2.44 |
| Silkeborg IF 2+ goals | 30.7% | 35.5% | −4.8 pp | 3.26 |
| Silkeborg IF at most 1 goal | 69.3% | 64.5% | +4.8 pp | 1.44 |
| Viborg FF 2+ goals | 48.3% | 57.7% | −9.4 pp | 2.07 |
| Viborg FF at most 1 goal | 51.7% | 42.3% | +9.4 pp | 1.93 |
| Over 1.5 goals | 79.1% | 82.8% | −3.7 pp | 1.26 |
| Under 1.5 goals | 20.9% | 17.2% | +3.7 pp | 4.78 |
| Over 2.5 goals | 51.7% | 61.0% | −9.3 pp | 1.93 |
| Under 2.5 goals | 48.3% | 39.0% | +9.3 pp | 2.07 |
Prices and probabilities are the ones stored before kick-off; nothing here is recalculated. Edge is the model's probability times the price, minus one, so a flagged outcome that lost is the ordinary case rather than a contradiction.
Model details
Show Hide
- Fit window
- the last 20 matches, recency weighted (a match 107 days old counts half)
- Silkeborg IF sample
- 20 matches
- Viborg FF sample
- 20 matches
- Computed
- 4 hours before kick-off
- Prices taken
- 4 hours before kick-off
Limitations
The model reads expected goals and nothing else. It does not know the lineups, who is injured or suspended, what either side has to play for, the weather, or how congested the schedule around this match is.