xgEdge

Expected goals

Servette FC expected goals (xG) 2026/2027

Swiss Super League · after 9 matches · updated 1 Oct

Servette FC's attacking and defensive expected goals in Swiss Super League 2026/2027, compared with the results they produced and with the rest of the competition.

Servette FC xG and xGA per match

Every match ↓
Attack
1.41 xG per match
#9/12
Attack (xG per match) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club xG per match
#1 FC Sion 2.31
#2 Young Boys 2.28
#3 Grasshopper Club Zürich 2.01
#4 FC Luzern 1.95
#5 FC St. Gallen 1879 1.95
#6 FC Lugano 1.70
#7 FC Vaduz 1.66
#8 FC Thun 1.53
#9 Servette FC 1.41
#10 FC Zürich 1.38
#11 Basel 1.22
#12 FC Lausanne-Sport 0.85
League avg
1.69
Total
12.72 9 matches
Defence
1.53 xGA per match
#7/12
Defence (xGA per match) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club xGA per match
#1 FC Lugano 1.26
#2 FC Lausanne-Sport 1.37
#3 Basel 1.39
#4 Young Boys 1.41
#5 FC St. Gallen 1879 1.43
#6 FC Sion 1.48
#7 Servette FC 1.53
#8 FC Zürich 1.93
#9 FC Vaduz 2.00
#10 FC Luzern 2.02
#11 Grasshopper Club Zürich 2.18
#12 FC Thun 2.23
League avg
1.69
Total
13.77 9 matches
xG difference
-0.12 xGD per match
#6/12
xG difference (xGD per match) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club xGD per match
#1 Young Boys +0.87
#2 FC Sion +0.82
#3 FC St. Gallen 1879 +0.51
#4 FC Lugano +0.44
#5 FC Luzern -0.08
#6 Servette FC -0.12
#7 Basel -0.17
#8 Grasshopper Club Zürich -0.18
#9 FC Vaduz -0.34
#10 FC Lausanne-Sport -0.52
#11 FC Zürich -0.55
#12 FC Thun -0.70
League avg
0.00
Total
-1.05 9 matches
Expected points Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works →
1.30 xPts per match
#6/12
Expected points (xPts per match) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club xPts per match
#1 Young Boys 1.90
#2 FC Sion 1.90
#3 FC St. Gallen 1879 1.71
#4 FC Lugano 1.71
#5 FC Luzern 1.36
#6 Servette FC 1.30
#7 Grasshopper Club Zürich 1.29
#8 Basel 1.26
#9 FC Vaduz 1.18
#10 FC Zürich 1.12
#11 FC Thun 1.00
#12 FC Lausanne-Sport 0.94
League avg
1.39
Total
11.67 vs 10 actual pts

Early-season figures: after 9 matches, per-match rates can move quickly.

What the xG says

Servette FC's underlying numbers sit close to the Swiss Super League average. They rank #6 for xG difference at -0.12 per match, from about average shot volume at the league's lowest chance quality. Their 11 goals are 1.72 below 12.72 xG, while 10 points are 1.67 below 11.67 xPts. After only 9 matches, those gaps should still be read cautiously.

Actual vs expected

Measure Actual Expected Difference Reading
Goals vs xG Includes 1.74 xG from penalties
11 12.72 -1.72 scored 1.72 fewer than xG within normal variance
Goals conceded vs xGA
13 13.77 -0.77 conceded 0.77 fewer than xGA within normal variance
Points vs xPts Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works →
10 11.67 -1.67 1.67 points below xPts within normal variance

Select a row to chart it across the season.

Goals minus xG, match by match

Servette FC are 1.72 goals below their xG after 9 matches. The gap was widest at -5.66, against FC Lausanne-Sport on Sun 13/09.

Goals
11
xG
12.72
Gap
-1.72
Sat 25/07 Sat 01/08 Sat 08/08 Sat 29/08 Thu 03/09 Sun 06/09 Sun 13/09 Wed 16/09 Sat 19/09 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 -1.14 -1.67 -1.82 -2.46 -4.27 -5.17 -5.66 -3.18 -1.72 -1.14 -0.53 -0.15 -0.64 -1.81 -0.90 -0.49 +2.48 +1.46 Running gap goals − xG Each match goals − xG
Servette FC: Goals vs xG, the gap after every match with xG
Date Opponent Goals xG Match gap Running gap
Sat 25/07 Basel 0 1.14 -1.14 -1.14
Sat 01/08 FC Zürich 1 1.53 -0.53 -1.67
Sat 08/08 Grasshopper Club Zürich 2 2.15 -0.15 -1.82
Sat 29/08 FC Luzern 1 1.64 -0.64 -2.46
Thu 03/09 FC Lugano 0 1.81 -1.81 -4.27
Sun 06/09 FC St. Gallen 1879 0 0.90 -0.90 -5.17
Sun 13/09 FC Lausanne-Sport 1 1.49 -0.49 -5.66
Wed 16/09 FC Thun 4 1.52 +2.48 -3.18
Sat 19/09 Young Boys 2 0.54 +1.46 -1.72

Goals vs xG ranking → Expected points ranking → Compare with every club in Europe →

Servette FC xG trend

Current form -0.68 npxGD per match

The last 6 matches with xG.

Out-created the opponent in 4 of 9 matches. The worst was against Young Boys on Sat 19/09 (-1.81).

npxG · last 6
1.03
npxGA · last 6
1.71
-2 -1 0 +1 +2 +0.29 Sat 25/07 +0.05 Sat 01/08 +1.20 Sat 08/08 +0.26 Sat 29/08 -0.62 Thu 03/09 -0.47 Sun 06/09 -0.74 Sun 13/09 -0.70 Wed 16/09 -1.81 Sat 19/09 -0.28 season avg
Servette FC: non-penalty xG, xGA and their difference in each match, with the season's average so far
Date Opponent npxG npxGA npxGD Avg so far
Sat 25/07 Basel 1.11 0.82 +0.29 +0.29
Sat 01/08 FC Zürich 1.53 1.48 +0.05 +0.17
Sat 08/08 Grasshopper Club Zürich 2.17 0.97 +1.20 +0.51
Sat 29/08 FC Luzern 1.49 1.23 +0.26 +0.45
Thu 03/09 FC Lugano 1.02 1.64 -0.62 +0.24
Sun 06/09 FC St. Gallen 1879 0.90 1.37 -0.47 +0.12
Sun 13/09 FC Lausanne-Sport 0.70 1.44 -0.74 +0.00
Wed 16/09 FC Thun 1.52 2.22 -0.70 -0.09
Sat 19/09 Young Boys 0.54 2.35 -1.81 -0.28

Each bar is one match's non-penalty xG minus the non-penalty xG against; the line is that difference averaged over the season up to each match, and it finishes on the dashed season average — 1.22 npxG and 1.50 npxGA per match. Current form is the same difference over the last 6 matches with xG.

Form ranking →

Strength of schedule

Season so far
tied number 8 hardest of 12 in Swiss Super League
−0.02 xG vs league average
Over 9 league matches
Last 5
number 2 hardest of 12 in Swiss Super League
+0.14 xG vs league average
Over 5 league matches
Opponents behind the figures

Season so far

−0.02 xG vs league average · over 9 matches · tied number 8 hardest of 12

  1. Young Boys Away +0.42
  2. FC Thun Away −0.14
  3. FC Lausanne-Sport Away −0.37
  4. FC St. Gallen 1879 Home +0.47
  5. FC Lugano Away +0.33
  6. FC Luzern Home −0.05
  7. Grasshopper Club Zürich Home −0.32
  8. FC Zürich Away −0.27
  9. Basel Home −0.28

Last 5

+0.14 xG vs league average · over 5 matches · number 2 hardest of 12

  1. Young Boys Away +0.42
  2. FC Thun Away −0.14
  3. FC Lausanne-Sport Away −0.37
  4. FC St. Gallen 1879 Home +0.47
  5. FC Lugano Away +0.33

League schedule strength → How this is calculated →

Servette FC shots and chance quality

Average volume, low quality. Servette FC take 14.3 shots a match (league 15.3) at 0.09 npxG a shot (league 0.10), #8 in Swiss Super League for volume and #12 for quality. 68% of their shots come from inside the box (league 68%), and set pieces produce 24% of their npxG (league 27%).

Attack

Shot volume
14.3 shots per match
#8/12
Shot volume (shots per match) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club shots per match
#1 FC St. Gallen 1879 20.9
#2 Young Boys 19.1
#3 FC Lugano 16.9
#4 FC Luzern 16.8
#5 FC Sion 16.6
#6 FC Thun 15.7
#7 Grasshopper Club Zürich 15.4
#8 Servette FC 14.3
#9 FC Vaduz 14.1
#10 FC Zürich 12.6
#11 Basel 11.8
#12 FC Lausanne-Sport 9.1
League avg
15.3
Total
129 shots from 9 matches
Chance quality
0.09 npxG per shot
#12/12
Chance quality (npxG per shot) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club npxG per shot
#1 FC Sion 0.13
#2 Grasshopper Club Zürich 0.12
#3 FC Vaduz 0.11
#4 Young Boys 0.11
#5 FC Luzern 0.11
#6 FC Zürich 0.11
#7 FC Lugano 0.10
#8 FC Thun 0.10
#9 FC Lausanne-Sport 0.09
#10 Basel 0.09
#11 FC St. Gallen 1879 0.09
#12 Servette FC 0.09
League avg
0.10
Total
10.98 npxG from 129 shots

Defence

Shots allowed
14.3 shots per match
#6/12
Shots allowed (shots per match) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club shots per match
#1 FC Lugano 11.8
#2 FC St. Gallen 1879 12.7
#3 FC Sion 13.0
#4 FC Zürich 13.9
#5 Young Boys 14.0
#6 Servette FC 14.3
#7 Grasshopper Club Zürich 15.9
#8 FC Lausanne-Sport 16.2
#9 FC Thun 17.1
#10 Basel 17.6
#11 FC Vaduz 18.2
#12 FC Luzern 18.6
League avg
15.3
Total
129 shots allowed from 9 matches
Chance quality allowed
0.10 npxGA per shot
#7/12
Chance quality allowed (npxGA per shot) across Swiss Super League, best first
Rank Club npxGA per shot
#1 Basel 0.08
#2 FC Lausanne-Sport 0.08
#3 Young Boys 0.10
#4 FC Sion 0.10
#5 FC Lugano 0.10
#6 FC Luzern 0.10
#7 Servette FC 0.10
#8 FC St. Gallen 1879 0.11
#9 FC Vaduz 0.11
#10 FC Thun 0.12
#11 Grasshopper Club Zürich 0.13
#12 FC Zürich 0.13
League avg
0.10
Total
13.52 npxGA from 129 shots

Shot profile

Shot location

68% inside the box

League avg 68%

From 88 of 129 shots over 9 matches

Early-season figure: after 9 matches, the share can move quickly.

Shots allowed, location

69% allowed inside the box

League avg 68%

From 89 of 129 shots allowed over 9 matches

Early-season figure: after 9 matches, the share can move quickly.

Where the npxG comes from

76% open play · 24% set pieces

League avg 27% set pieces

From 2.7 of 11.0 npxG over 9 matches

Early-season figure: after 9 matches, the share can move quickly.

Where the npxG allowed comes from

65% open play · 35% set pieces

League avg 27% set pieces

From 4.8 of 13.5 npxG allowed over 9 matches

Early-season figure: after 9 matches, the share can move quickly.

How the shot figures are made →

Servette FC home and away xG

Servette FC per-match figures at home and away
Measure Home Away
Matches 4 5
xG / match 1.46 1.38
xGA / match 1.30 1.72
xGD / match +0.16 -0.34
xPts / match Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works → 1.46 1.16

Every figure divides by that half's matches with xG. A half with fewer than 3 matches with xG is muted.

Every Servette FC match by xG

Window
Season Last 10 Last 5
Venue
All Home Away

At home this season

Matches
4
xG / match
1.46
xGA / match
1.30
xGD / match
+0.16
Points
4 of 12
  1. Sun 06/09 FC St. Gallen 1879 H xG 0.90 xGA 1.37 xGD -0.47
  2. Sat 29/08 FC Luzern H xG 1.64 xGA 1.23 xGD +0.41
  3. Sat 08/08 Grasshopper Club Zürich H xG 2.15 xGA 0.97 xGD +1.18
  4. Sat 25/07 Basel H xG 1.14 xGA 1.61 P xGD -0.47

Newest first. The dot is xG and the ring is xGA, on one scale from 0 to 3.00. Best and weakest underlying mark the highest and lowest xGD once 5 matches have xG. Against the chances marks a win with xGD of −1.00 or lower, or a loss with +1.00 or higher. P marks a side with at least 0.50 xG from penalties.

Every result, all competitions →

Servette FC in Swiss Super League

Attack

Defence

Overall

About the data

xG data
Provided by TheStatsAPI, and stored as published.
Derived metrics
xGD, per-match rates, rankings and rolling averages are calculated from the match data.
Model metrics
xPts is produced by our probability model.

Learn how our xG analytics work →

How the model works →

Mind if we count your visit?

We use Google Analytics only to see how many people visit and which pages they read. It loads after you allow it — no ads, no tracking across other sites. What we collect