xgEdge

Championship xG difference 2026/2027

Championship clubs ranked by xG difference (xGD) per match in 2026/2027: the expected goals each side creates less those it allows. Middlesbrough currently lead, +1.19 xGD per match across 12 matches.

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from the expected-goal columns; goals, G − xG and the rates taken from goals are unchanged.

Attack and defence

Championship: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Middlesbrough MID West Ham United Wolverhampton Millwall Southampton Queens Park Rangers Birmingham City Swansea City Cardiff City CAR Portsmouth POR Bristol City Wrexham Lincoln City Sheffield United West Bromwich Albion Norwich City Preston North End Burnley Charlton Athletic Blackburn Rovers Stoke City Bolton Wanderers Watford WAT Derby County
Every Championship club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
MID 2.18 0.98 +1.19
WHU 1.86 1.05 +0.82
WOL 1.57 0.84 +0.73
MIL 1.67 1.19 +0.48
SOU 1.62 1.14 +0.48
QUE 1.49 1.09 +0.40
BIR 1.56 1.21 +0.35
SWA 1.46 1.12 +0.34
CAR 1.66 1.40 +0.26
POR 1.16 1.05 +0.11
BRI 1.18 1.12 +0.06
WRE 1.15 1.13 +0.02
LIN 1.14 1.33 −0.20
SHE 1.13 1.34 −0.21
WES 1.19 1.39 −0.21
NOR 1.30 1.50 −0.21
PRE 1.19 1.48 −0.29
BUR 1.14 1.47 −0.32
CHA 1.02 1.36 −0.34
BLA 0.93 1.42 −0.49
STO 0.76 1.43 −0.67
BOL 1.17 1.92 −0.75
WAT 0.95 1.72 −0.77
DER 0.90 1.68 −0.78
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

Non-penalty xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Championship xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P npxG npxGA npxGD npxGD/match Pts
1 MID 12 26.11 11.81 +14.30 +1.19 25
2 WHU 12 22.35 12.57 +9.78 +0.82 22
3 WOL 12 18.89 10.13 +8.76 +0.73 21
4 MIL 12 20.03 14.24 +5.79 +0.48 15
4 SOU 12 19.45 13.72 +5.73 +0.48 24
6 QUE 12 17.92 13.10 +4.82 +0.40 20
7 BIR 12 18.69 14.52 +4.17 +0.35 20
8 SWA 12 17.48 13.44 +4.04 +0.34 23
9 CAR 12 19.92 16.79 +3.13 +0.26 14
10 POR 12 13.93 12.58 +1.35 +0.11 18
11 BRI 12 14.21 13.48 +0.73 +0.06 15
12 WRE 12 13.76 13.56 +0.20 +0.02 14
13 LIN 12 13.64 16.00 −2.36 −0.20 15
14 SHE 12 13.57 16.04 −2.47 −0.21 16
14 WES 12 14.26 16.73 −2.47 −0.21 21
14 NOR 12 15.55 18.04 −2.49 −0.21 12
17 PRE 12 14.22 17.73 −3.51 −0.29 5
18 BUR 12 13.71 17.59 −3.88 −0.32 8
19 CHA 12 12.20 16.30 −4.10 −0.34 14
20 BLA 12 11.20 17.06 −5.86 −0.49 18
21 STO 12 9.16 17.21 −8.05 −0.67 20
22 BOL 12 14.03 22.98 −8.95 −0.75 14
23 WAT 12 11.39 20.68 −9.29 −0.77 11
24 DER 12 10.83 20.20 −9.37 −0.78 7

What the data shows

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
npxG
— Non-penalty expected goals: xG with penalties removed
npxGA
— Non-penalty expected goals against: xGA with penalties removed
npxGD
— npxG minus npxGA
npxGD/match
— npxG minus npxGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →