xgEdge

Eredivisie xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every Eredivisie club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

Feyenoord lead on expected-goal difference, +1.96 a match over 7 matches with xG. That is 0.36 a match clear of AZ Alkmaar. Fortuna Sittard sit at the foot on −1.46 a match.

  • Best attack

    2.87 PSV Eindhoven

    20.12 xG in 7 matches

  • Best defence

    0.75 FC Twente

    5.23 xGA in 7 matches

  • Widest xG difference

    +1.96 Feyenoord

    +13.72 xGD in 7 matches

Attack and defence

Eredivisie: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Feyenoord FEY AZ Alkmaar FC Twente PSV Eindhoven PSV AFC Ajax Go Ahead Eagles Excelsior SC Heerenveen SCH NEC Nijmegen FC Groningen Sparta Rotterdam SC Cambuur FC Utrecht SC Telstar Willem II Tilburg ADO Den Haag PEC Zwolle Fortuna Sittard FOR
Every Eredivisie club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
FEY 2.76 0.80 +1.96
AZA 2.55 0.95 +1.60
FCT 2.28 0.75 +1.53
PSV 2.87 1.37 +1.51
AFC 2.65 1.25 +1.40
GOA 1.91 1.63 +0.28
EXC 1.35 1.44 −0.09
SCH 1.26 1.36 −0.10
NEC 1.60 1.92 −0.32
FCG 1.54 1.93 −0.39
SPA 1.64 2.10 −0.46
SCC 1.35 2.04 −0.68
FCU 1.41 2.11 −0.70
SCT 1.09 2.05 −0.96
WIL 1.29 2.28 −0.99
ADO 0.90 1.90 −1.00
PEC 0.94 2.06 −1.12
FOR 0.97 2.42 −1.46
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

All xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Eredivisie xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P xG xGA xGD xGD/match Pts
1 FEY 7 19.32 5.60 +13.72 +1.96 17
2 AZA 7 17.85 6.67 +11.18 +1.60 19
3 FCT 7 15.95 5.23 +10.72 +1.53 16
4 PSV 7 20.12 9.56 +10.56 +1.51 16
5 AFC 7 18.52 8.74 +9.78 +1.40 14
6 GOA 7 13.36 11.39 +1.97 +0.28 10
7 EXC 7 9.43 10.08 −0.65 −0.09 11
8 SCH 7 8.82 9.55 −0.73 −0.10 9
9 NEC 7 11.19 13.42 −2.23 −0.32 8
10 FCG 7 10.79 13.53 −2.74 −0.39 11
11 SPA 7 11.45 14.68 −3.23 −0.46 5
12 SCC 7 9.48 14.26 −4.78 −0.68 5
13 FCU 7 9.87 14.77 −4.90 −0.70 5
14 SCT 7 7.64 14.35 −6.71 −0.96 5
15 WIL 7 9.02 15.95 −6.93 −0.99 2
16 ADO 7 6.31 13.32 −7.01 −1.00 2
17 PEC 7 6.61 14.44 −7.83 −1.12 4
18 FOR 7 6.77 16.96 −10.19 −1.46 13

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
xG
— Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a team took
xGA
— Expected goals against: the summed chance quality of the shots a team allowed
xGD
— xG minus xGA
xGD/match
— xG minus xGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →