xgEdge
Eredivisie

Eredivisie xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every Eredivisie club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

All xG Non-penalty xG

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from the expected-goal columns; goals, G − xG and the rates taken from goals are unchanged.

Feyenoord lead on expected-goal difference, +1.84 a match over 7 matches with xG. That is 0.29 a match clear of AZ Alkmaar. Fortuna Sittard sit at the foot on −1.43 a match.

  • Best attack

    2.64 AFC Ajax

    18.51 xG in 7 matches

  • Best defence

    0.65 FC Twente

    4.53 xGA in 7 matches

  • Widest xG difference

    +1.84 Feyenoord

    +12.86 xGD in 7 matches

Attack and defence

Eredivisie: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Feyenoord FEY AZ Alkmaar AFC Ajax FC Twente PSV Eindhoven PSV Go Ahead Eagles Excelsior SC Heerenveen SCH NEC Nijmegen FC Groningen SC Cambuur Sparta Rotterdam FC Utrecht ADO Den Haag Willem II Tilburg PEC Zwolle SC Telstar Fortuna Sittard FOR
Every Eredivisie club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
FEY 2.60 0.76 +1.84
AZA 2.54 0.99 +1.54
AFC 2.64 1.25 +1.40
FCT 2.02 0.65 +1.38
PSV 2.63 1.34 +1.29
GOA 1.92 1.50 +0.42
EXC 1.38 1.40 −0.01
SCH 1.27 1.41 −0.14
NEC 1.56 1.92 −0.36
FCG 1.49 1.88 −0.39
SCC 1.35 1.77 −0.42
SPA 1.64 2.11 −0.47
FCU 1.29 1.88 −0.60
ADO 0.90 1.77 −0.87
WIL 1.27 2.28 −1.01
PEC 0.91 1.96 −1.05
SCT 0.82 1.93 −1.11
FOR 0.93 2.36 −1.43
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

Non-penalty xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Eredivisie xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P npxG npxGA npxGD npxGD/match Pts
1 FEY 7 18.21 5.35 +12.86 +1.84 17
2 AZA 7 17.76 6.95 +10.81 +1.54 19
3 AFC 7 18.51 8.74 +9.77 +1.40 14
4 FCT 7 14.16 4.53 +9.63 +1.38 16
5 PSV 7 18.43 9.40 +9.03 +1.29 16
6 GOA 7 13.47 10.52 +2.95 +0.42 10
7 EXC 7 9.69 9.79 −0.10 −0.01 11
8 SCH 7 8.92 9.88 −0.96 −0.14 9
9 NEC 7 10.93 13.43 −2.50 −0.36 8
10 FCG 7 10.40 13.13 −2.73 −0.39 11
11 SCC 7 9.43 12.37 −2.94 −0.42 5
12 SPA 7 11.45 14.77 −3.32 −0.47 5
13 FCU 7 9.01 13.19 −4.18 −0.60 5
14 ADO 7 6.30 12.40 −6.10 −0.87 2
15 WIL 7 8.89 15.94 −7.05 −1.01 2
16 PEC 7 6.35 13.72 −7.37 −1.05 4
17 SCT 7 5.72 13.51 −7.79 −1.11 5
18 FOR 7 6.51 16.52 −10.01 −1.43 13

Goals against chances made

Most goals above xG

Most goals below xG

Goals against chances allowed

Most conceded above xGA

Fewest conceded against xGA

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
npxG
— Non-penalty expected goals: xG with penalties removed
npxGA
— Non-penalty expected goals against: xGA with penalties removed
npxGD
— npxG minus npxGA
npxGD/match
— npxG minus npxGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →

Mind if we count your visit?

We use Google Analytics only to see how many people visit and which pages they read. It loads after you allow it — no ads, no tracking across other sites. What we collect