xgEdge

Results

HNK Gorica results 2026/2027

HNK Gorica · HNL 2026/2027 →

HNK Gorica's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 4 of 4 matching results

8 played this season

Reset filters

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
1 win, 0 draws, 3 losses

3 pts 2–6 goals −4 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
3.87 – 5.11
0.97 – 1.28 per match
xGD
-1.24
-0.31 per match
xG record
1 with the chances, 1 with even chances, 2 against them

Small sample: 4 matches.

Comparable xG: 4 of 4 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

3 pts 4.3 xPts

−1.3 vs xPts

Small sample: 4 matches.

Matched xPts: 4 of 4 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · All competitions · Away

HNK Gorica's poor return follows chances that have gone against them at both ends. They out-created the opponent in 1 of 4 matches, for −1.24 xG difference overall on 3.87–5.11. Their points total of 3 sits 1.3 below the model's 4.3 xPts, so the chances have clearly outrun the results.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 4 results HNK Gorica are 1.31 points below their xPts. The gap was widest at -3.52, against GNK Dinamo Zagreb on Sat 05/09.

Points
3
xPts
4.31
Gap
-1.31
Sat 08/08 Sat 22/08 Sat 05/09 Sat 19/09 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 -1.68 -2.88 -3.52 -1.31 -1.68 -1.20 -0.64 +2.21 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
HNK Gorica: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sat 08/08 NK Lokomotiva Zagreb 0 1.68 -1.68 -1.68
Sat 22/08 NK Slaven Belupo 0 1.20 -1.20 -2.88
Sat 05/09 GNK Dinamo Zagreb 0 0.64 -0.64 -3.52
Sat 19/09 NK Istra 1961 3 0.79 +2.21 -1.31

Scores and xG

HNK Gorica first

  • Away HNL Win against the chances

    xG 0.61

    xGA 1.21

    xGD -0.60

    1:0 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · NK Istra 1961, Sat 19/09

    The team won despite recording less xG than its opponent. That contrast does not make the win impossible or establish why it happened.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    0.79
    Points minus xPts
    +2.21

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away HNL Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.79

    xGA 1.70

    xGD -0.91

    0:1 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · GNK Dinamo Zagreb, Sat 05/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.64
    Points minus xPts
    -0.64

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away HNL Loss with even chances

    xG 0.93

    xGA 1.07

    xGD -0.14

    0:2 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · NK Slaven Belupo, Sat 22/08

    The team lost, while the chance difference was approximately even. The outcome was weaker than that difference alone suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.20
    Points minus xPts
    -1.20

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away HNL Loss against the chances

    xG 1.54

    xGA 1.13

    xGD +0.41

    1:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · NK Lokomotiva Zagreb, Sat 08/08

    The team lost despite recording a positive xG difference. The outcome was weaker than that chance advantage suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.68
    Points minus xPts
    -1.68

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →