Serie A

Serie A table 2025/2026

Leader Inter 87 pts
Most above xPts Napoli +13.27 against expected points
Most below xPts Pisa −22.56 against expected points

The standings, with the expected figures beside them: what each club's chances were worth, match by match, next to what it actually took.

Actual table Expected table

All xG Non-penalty xG

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is unchanged.

Serie A 2025/2026 table
# restore the table order	Team	P sort descending	W sort descending	D sort descending	L sort descending	GF sort descending	GA sort descending	GD sort descending	Pts sort descending	npxG sort descending	npxGA sort descending	npxGD sort descending	xPts sort descending	Pts vs xPts sort descending
1	Inter INT	38	27	6	5	89	35	+54	87	67.18	32.12	+35.06	77.30	+9.70
2	Napoli NAP	38	23	7	8	58	36	+22	76	48.52	29.84	+18.68	62.73	+13.27
3	Roma ROM	38	23	4	11	59	31	+28	73	49.51	38.81	+10.70	63.92	+9.08
4	Como COM	38	20	11	7	65	29	+36	71	55.55	29.97	+25.58	69.43	+1.57
5	Milan MIL	38	20	10	8	53	35	+18	70	52.03	38.23	+13.80	62.69	+7.31
6	Juventus JUV	38	19	12	7	61	34	+27	69	64.49	30.70	+33.79	74.53	−5.53
7	Atalanta ATA	38	15	14	9	51	36	+15	59	55.85	39.93	+15.92	63.77	−4.77
8	Bologna BOL	38	16	8	14	49	46	+3	56	39.76	43.01	−3.25	50.87	+5.13
9	Lazio LAZ	38	14	12	12	41	40	+1	54	40.93	43.68	−2.75	46.06	+7.94
10	Udinese UDI	38	14	8	16	45	48	−3	50	39.13	47.73	−8.60	45.82	+4.18
11	Sassuolo SAS	38	14	7	17	46	50	−4	49	39.85	50.17	−10.32	44.10	+4.90
12	Parma PAR	38	11	12	15	28	46	−18	45	30.56	52.19	−21.63	37.21	+7.79
13	Torino TOR	38	12	9	17	44	63	−19	45	39.99	51.60	−11.61	45.47	−0.47
14	Cagliari CAG	38	11	10	17	40	53	−13	43	37.35	52.74	−15.39	41.53	+1.47
15	Fiorentina FIO	38	9	15	14	41	50	−9	42	48.98	46.29	+2.69	53.61	−11.61
16	Genoa GEN	38	10	11	17	41	51	−10	41	40.18	45.11	−4.93	48.05	−7.05
17	Lecce LEC	38	10	8	20	28	50	−22	38	29.90	51.32	−21.42	35.78	+2.22
18	Cremonese CRE	38	8	10	20	32	57	−25	34	32.58	53.62	−21.04	38.32	−4.32
19	Hellas Verona VER	38	3	12	23	25	61	−36	21	33.77	48.72	−14.95	42.33	−21.33
20	Pisa PIS	38	2	12	24	26	71	−45	18	33.65	53.98	−20.33	40.56	−22.56

More points than xPts
Fewer points than xPts

The provider published an implausible non-penalty figure for 1 of these matches — under 50% of the match total, which needs more penalties than a match usually has. Those matches fall back to total xG in the npxG columns.

How to read this table

xG: Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a club took. A chance scored nine times in ten is worth 0.9.
xGA: Expected goals against: the same measure for the shots a club allowed.
xGD: xG minus xGA: how far a club's chances outweighed its opponents', or the other way round.
xPts: Expected points: the points a club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average. Each match's two xG figures become chances of a win, a draw and a loss, and a win is worth 3 and a draw 1.
Pts vs xPts: Actual points minus expected points based on match xG. Positive, drawn in green, is more points than the chances were worth on average; negative, in red, is fewer. It measures the gap and says nothing about its cause.
npxG: Non-penalty xG: xG with penalties removed, offered where the competition's figures support it. It changes xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is always worked out from all xG.

Expected points are read off the same score matrix that prices the board: each played match's two xG totals are taken as scoring rates, and the team's share is 3 × P(win) + 1 × P(draw), summed over the season. Understat arrives at the same figure by simulating each shot, which needs per-shot data, held here for %{competitions}. Passes per defensive action and deep completions are not shown because no source here ingests the event data behind them.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →