xgEdge

Results

Hamburger SV results 2026/2027

Hamburger SV · Bundesliga 2026/2027 →

Hamburger SV's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 4 of 4 matching results

4 played this season

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
1 win, 0 draws, 3 losses

3 pts 2–13 goals −11 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
3.65 – 8.14
0.91 – 2.04 per match
xGD
-4.49
-1.12 per match
xG record
0 with the chances, 1 with even chances, 3 against them

Small sample: 4 matches.

Comparable xG: 4 of 4 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

3 pts 2.8 xPts

+0.2 vs xPts

Small sample: 4 matches.

Matched xPts: 4 of 4 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · All competitions · All venues

Hamburger SV's poor return follows chances that have gone against them at both ends. They out-created the opponent in 1 of 4 matches, for −4.49 xG difference overall on 3.65–8.14. Their points total of 3 lands on the model's 2.8 xPts, so the results have followed the chances closely.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 4 results Hamburger SV are 0.17 points above their xPts.

Points
3
xPts
2.83
Gap
+0.17
Sat 29/08 Sun 06/09 Sun 13/09 Sat 19/09 -2 -1 0 +1 -0.86 -0.93 -1.44 +0.17 -0.86 -0.07 -0.51 +1.61 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
Hamburger SV: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sat 29/08 Borussia Dortmund 0 0.86 -0.86 -0.86
Sun 06/09 1. FSV Mainz 05 0 0.07 -0.07 -0.93
Sun 13/09 RB Leipzig 0 0.51 -0.51 -1.44
Sat 19/09 1. FC Köln 3 1.39 +1.61 +0.17

Scores and xG

Hamburger SV first

  • Home Bundesliga Win with even chances

    xG 1.45

    xGA 1.41

    xGD +0.04

    2:1 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · 1. FC Köln, Sat 19/09

    The team won, while the chance difference was approximately even. The outcome was stronger than that difference alone suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    1.39
    Points minus xPts
    +1.61

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Bundesliga Loss backed by the chances

    xG 1.10

    xGA 2.43

    xGD -1.33

    0:5 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · RB Leipzig, Sun 13/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.52
    Points minus xPts
    -0.52

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Bundesliga Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.19

    xGA 2.77

    xGD -2.58

    0:5 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · 1. FSV Mainz 05, Sun 06/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.07
    Points minus xPts
    -0.07

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Bundesliga Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.91

    xGA 1.53

    xGD -0.62

    0:2 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Borussia Dortmund, Sat 29/08

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.86
    Points minus xPts
    -0.86

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →