Expected goals
Lillestrøm SK expected goals (xG) 2026/2027
Eliteserien · after 21 matches · updated 4 Oct
Lillestrøm SK's attacking and defensive expected goals in Eliteserien 2026/2027, compared with the results they produced and with the rest of the competition.
Lillestrøm SK xG and xGA per match
Every match ↓| Rank | Club | xG per match |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | 2.31 |
| #2 | Viking FK | 2.09 |
| #3 | Molde FK | 1.83 |
| #4 | Tromsø IL | 1.60 |
| #5 | SK Brann | 1.58 |
| #6 | Rosenborg BK | 1.56 |
| #7 | Lillestrøm SK | 1.56 |
| #8 | Vålerenga IF | 1.55 |
| #9 | Sarpsborg 08 | 1.51 |
| #10 | Aalesunds FK | 1.40 |
| #11 | IK Start | 1.36 |
| #12 | Fredrikstad FK | 1.20 |
| #13 | Sandefjord Fotball | 1.18 |
| #14 | HamKam | 1.14 |
| #15 | KFUM Oslo | 1.09 |
| #16 | Kristiansund BK | 0.97 |
- League avg
- 1.50
- Total
- 32.67 21 matches
| Rank | Club | xGA per match |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | 0.90 |
| #2 | Viking FK | 1.16 |
| #3 | Molde FK | 1.17 |
| #4 | Tromsø IL | 1.23 |
| #5 | Sarpsborg 08 | 1.40 |
| #6 | Rosenborg BK | 1.42 |
| #7 | Lillestrøm SK | 1.46 |
| #8 | SK Brann | 1.53 |
| #9 | Sandefjord Fotball | 1.59 |
| #10 | IK Start | 1.61 |
| #11 | Vålerenga IF | 1.63 |
| #12 | HamKam | 1.66 |
| #13 | Fredrikstad FK | 1.67 |
| #14 | Kristiansund BK | 1.72 |
| #15 | KFUM Oslo | 1.78 |
| #16 | Aalesunds FK | 1.98 |
- League avg
- 1.50
- Total
- 30.60 21 matches
| Rank | Club | xGD per match |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | +1.41 |
| #2 | Viking FK | +0.93 |
| #3 | Molde FK | +0.66 |
| #4 | Tromsø IL | +0.37 |
| #5 | Rosenborg BK | +0.14 |
| #6 | Sarpsborg 08 | +0.11 |
| #7 | Lillestrøm SK | +0.10 |
| #8 | SK Brann | +0.05 |
| #9 | Vålerenga IF | -0.08 |
| #10 | IK Start | -0.25 |
| #11 | Sandefjord Fotball | -0.41 |
| #12 | Fredrikstad FK | -0.47 |
| #13 | HamKam | -0.52 |
| #14 | Aalesunds FK | -0.58 |
| #15 | KFUM Oslo | -0.69 |
| #16 | Kristiansund BK | -0.75 |
- League avg
- 0.00
- Total
- +2.07 21 matches
| Rank | Club | xPts per match |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | 2.24 |
| #2 | Viking FK | 1.97 |
| #3 | Molde FK | 1.80 |
| #4 | Tromsø IL | 1.68 |
| #5 | Rosenborg BK | 1.52 |
| #6 | Lillestrøm SK | 1.46 |
| #7 | Sarpsborg 08 | 1.45 |
| #8 | SK Brann | 1.40 |
| #9 | Vålerenga IF | 1.33 |
| #10 | IK Start | 1.19 |
| #11 | Fredrikstad FK | 1.10 |
| #12 | Sandefjord Fotball | 1.09 |
| #13 | HamKam | 1.05 |
| #14 | Aalesunds FK | 1.04 |
| #15 | Kristiansund BK | 0.95 |
| #16 | KFUM Oslo | 0.94 |
- League avg
- 1.39
- Total
- 30.76 vs 32 actual pts
What the xG says
Lillestrøm SK's underlying numbers sit close to the Eliteserien average. They rank #7 for xG difference at +0.10 per match, from about average shot volume at about average chance quality. Their 28 goals are 4.67 below 32.67 xG, while 32 points are 1.24 above 30.76 xPts.
Actual vs expected
Select a row to chart it across the season.
Goals minus xG, match by match
Lillestrøm SK are 4.67 goals below their xG after 21 matches. The gap was widest at -4.87, against Fredrikstad FK on Sun 30/08.
- Goals
- 28
- xG
- 32.67
- Gap
- -4.67
- This match
- Match gap
- Running gap
| Date | Opponent | Goals | xG | Match gap | Running gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 15/03 | Aalesunds FK | 3 | 2.36 | +0.64 | +0.64 |
| Mon 06/04 | Molde FK | 1 | 1.50 | -0.50 | +0.14 |
| Sat 11/04 | IK Start | 3 | 1.81 | +1.19 | +1.33 |
| Wed 15/04 | Tromsø IL | 0 | 1.38 | -1.38 | -0.05 |
| Sun 19/04 | Vålerenga IF | 2 | 1.71 | +0.29 | +0.24 |
| Sun 26/04 | Bodø/Glimt | 0 | 1.08 | -1.08 | -0.84 |
| Sun 03/05 | Sarpsborg 08 | 4 | 2.37 | +1.63 | +0.79 |
| Sun 10/05 | Rosenborg BK | 0 | 0.41 | -0.41 | +0.38 |
| Sat 16/05 | Sandefjord Fotball | 3 | 1.91 | +1.09 | +1.47 |
| Wed 20/05 | Kristiansund BK | 1 | 1.01 | -0.01 | +1.46 |
| Mon 25/05 | HamKam | 0 | 1.59 | -1.59 | -0.13 |
| Sat 11/07 | Fredrikstad FK | 2 | 1.24 | +0.76 | +0.63 |
| Sat 18/07 | KFUM Oslo | 2 | 1.24 | +0.76 | +1.39 |
| Wed 22/07 | Viking FK | 1 | 1.35 | -0.35 | +1.04 |
| Fri 31/07 | Bodø/Glimt | 0 | 0.38 | -0.38 | +0.66 |
| Sun 09/08 | Rosenborg BK | 0 | 2.39 | -2.39 | -1.73 |
| Sat 15/08 | KFUM Oslo | 1 | 2.80 | -1.80 | -3.53 |
| Sun 30/08 | Fredrikstad FK | 1 | 2.34 | -1.34 | -4.87 |
| Sat 05/09 | SK Brann | 2 | 1.33 | +0.67 | -4.20 |
| Sat 12/09 | Vålerenga IF | 2 | 0.70 | +1.30 | -2.90 |
| Sun 20/09 | Viking FK | 0 | 1.77 | -1.77 | -4.67 |
Goals vs xG ranking → Expected points ranking → Compare with every club in Europe →
Lillestrøm SK xG trend
Current form -0.24 npxGD per match
The last 6 matches with xG.
Out-created the opponent in 11 of 21 matches. The worst was against Bodø/Glimt on Fri 31/07 (-1.22).
- npxG · last 6
- 1.56
- npxGA · last 6
- 1.80
- npxG
- npxGA
- npxGD
- Avg so far
| Date | Opponent | npxG | npxGA | npxGD | Avg so far |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 15/03 | Aalesunds FK | 2.23 | 0.94 | +1.29 | +1.29 |
| Mon 06/04 | Molde FK | 1.50 | 1.03 | +0.47 | +0.88 |
| Sat 11/04 | IK Start | 1.82 | 0.73 | +1.09 | +0.95 |
| Wed 15/04 | Tromsø IL | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 | +0.72 |
| Sun 19/04 | Vålerenga IF | 1.14 | 1.07 | +0.07 | +0.59 |
| Sun 26/04 | Bodø/Glimt | 1.08 | 0.63 | +0.45 | +0.56 |
| Sun 03/05 | Sarpsborg 08 | 0.79 | 0.83 | -0.04 | +0.48 |
| Sun 10/05 | Rosenborg BK | 0.41 | 1.09 | -0.68 | +0.33 |
| Sat 16/05 | Sandefjord Fotball | 1.82 | 1.04 | +0.78 | +0.38 |
| Wed 20/05 | Kristiansund BK | 0.78 | 1.06 | -0.28 | +0.32 |
| Mon 25/05 | HamKam | 1.59 | 1.29 | +0.30 | +0.32 |
| Sat 11/07 | Fredrikstad FK | 1.22 | 0.86 | +0.36 | +0.32 |
| Sat 18/07 | KFUM Oslo | 1.27 | 0.56 | +0.71 | +0.35 |
| Wed 22/07 | Viking FK | 0.58 | 0.87 | -0.29 | +0.30 |
| Fri 31/07 | Bodø/Glimt | 0.35 | 1.57 | -1.22 | +0.20 |
| Sun 09/08 | Rosenborg BK | 2.24 | 2.32 | -0.08 | +0.18 |
| Sat 15/08 | KFUM Oslo | 2.01 | 0.92 | +1.09 | +0.24 |
| Sun 30/08 | Fredrikstad FK | 1.39 | 2.29 | -0.90 | +0.17 |
| Sat 05/09 | SK Brann | 1.33 | 1.88 | -0.55 | +0.14 |
| Sat 12/09 | Vålerenga IF | 0.70 | 1.59 | -0.89 | +0.08 |
| Sun 20/09 | Viking FK | 1.70 | 1.82 | -0.12 | +0.08 |
Each bar is one match's non-penalty xG minus the non-penalty xG against; the line is that difference averaged over the season up to each match, and it finishes on the dashed season average — 1.30 npxG and 1.22 npxGA per match. Current form is the same difference over the last 6 matches with xG.
Strength of schedule
- Season so far
- number 1 hardest of 16 in Eliteserien
- +0.04 xG vs league average
- Over 21 league matches
- Last 5
- number 11 hardest of 16 in Eliteserien
- −0.05 xG vs league average
- Over 5 league matches
Opponents behind the figures
Season so far
+0.04 xG vs league average · over 21 matches · number 1 hardest of 16
- Viking FK Away +0.35
- Vålerenga IF Home +0.11
- SK Brann Away 0.00
- Fredrikstad FK Home −0.20
- KFUM Oslo Away −0.52
- Rosenborg BK Home +0.14
- Bodø/Glimt Away +0.79
- Viking FK Home +0.35
- KFUM Oslo Home −0.52
- Fredrikstad FK Away −0.20
- HamKam Away −0.51
- Kristiansund BK Home −0.36
- Sandefjord Fotball Home −0.13
- Rosenborg BK Away +0.14
- Sarpsborg 08 Home +0.08
- Bodø/Glimt Home +0.79
- Vålerenga IF Away +0.11
- Tromsø IL Away +0.08
- IK Start Home +0.04
- Molde FK Away +0.35
- Aalesunds FK Away −0.12
Last 5
−0.05 xG vs league average · over 5 matches · number 11 hardest of 16
- Viking FK Away +0.35
- Vålerenga IF Home +0.11
- SK Brann Away 0.00
- Fredrikstad FK Home −0.20
- KFUM Oslo Away −0.52
Lillestrøm SK shots and chance quality
Average volume, average quality. Lillestrøm SK take 12.5 shots a match (league 13.8) at 0.10 npxG a shot (league 0.10), #12 in Eliteserien for volume and #5 for quality. 69% of their shots come from inside the box (league 69%), and set pieces produce 24% of their npxG (league 24%).
Attack
| Rank | Club | shots per match |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | 17.7 |
| =2 | Viking FK | 16.2 |
| =2 | Vålerenga IF | 16.2 |
| #4 | Aalesunds FK | 15.6 |
| #5 | Molde FK | 15.4 |
| #6 | Sandefjord Fotball | 14.5 |
| #7 | SK Brann | 14.1 |
| #8 | IK Start | 14.0 |
| #9 | Rosenborg BK | 13.6 |
| #10 | Tromsø IL | 13.5 |
| #11 | Sarpsborg 08 | 13.3 |
| #12 | Lillestrøm SK | 12.5 |
| #13 | Kristiansund BK | 12.5 |
| #14 | Fredrikstad FK | 11.3 |
| #15 | KFUM Oslo | 10.5 |
| #16 | HamKam | 10.4 |
- League avg
- 13.8
- Total
- 263 shots from 21 matches
| Rank | Club | npxG per shot |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | 0.11 |
| #2 | Tromsø IL | 0.11 |
| #3 | Viking FK | 0.11 |
| #4 | Molde FK | 0.11 |
| #5 | Lillestrøm SK | 0.10 |
| #6 | Rosenborg BK | 0.10 |
| #7 | Sarpsborg 08 | 0.10 |
| #8 | Fredrikstad FK | 0.10 |
| #9 | HamKam | 0.10 |
| #10 | SK Brann | 0.10 |
| #11 | KFUM Oslo | 0.09 |
| #12 | IK Start | 0.09 |
| #13 | Vålerenga IF | 0.09 |
| #14 | Aalesunds FK | 0.09 |
| #15 | Kristiansund BK | 0.08 |
| #16 | Sandefjord Fotball | 0.07 |
- League avg
- 0.10
- Total
- 27.26 npxG from 263 shots
Defence
| Rank | Club | shots per match |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Bodø/Glimt | 8.3 |
| #2 | Tromsø IL | 11.2 |
| #3 | Molde FK | 12.0 |
| #4 | Viking FK | 13.0 |
| #5 | Sarpsborg 08 | 13.1 |
| #6 | Rosenborg BK | 13.3 |
| #7 | Lillestrøm SK | 13.9 |
| #8 | SK Brann | 14.4 |
| #9 | IK Start | 14.4 |
| #10 | KFUM Oslo | 14.7 |
| #11 | Vålerenga IF | 14.8 |
| #12 | Fredrikstad FK | 15.0 |
| =13 | Kristiansund BK | 15.0 |
| =13 | Sandefjord Fotball | 15.0 |
| #15 | HamKam | 16.4 |
| #16 | Aalesunds FK | 16.9 |
- League avg
- 13.8
- Total
- 291 shots allowed from 21 matches
| Rank | Club | npxGA per shot |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Viking FK | 0.08 |
| #2 | Sandefjord Fotball | 0.09 |
| #3 | Lillestrøm SK | 0.09 |
| #4 | Sarpsborg 08 | 0.09 |
| #5 | Molde FK | 0.09 |
| #6 | IK Start | 0.10 |
| #7 | SK Brann | 0.10 |
| #8 | Vålerenga IF | 0.10 |
| #9 | Fredrikstad FK | 0.10 |
| #10 | HamKam | 0.10 |
| #11 | Kristiansund BK | 0.10 |
| #12 | Rosenborg BK | 0.10 |
| #13 | Tromsø IL | 0.10 |
| #14 | KFUM Oslo | 0.10 |
| #15 | Bodø/Glimt | 0.11 |
| #16 | Aalesunds FK | 0.11 |
- League avg
- 0.10
- Total
- 25.68 npxGA from 291 shots
Shot profile
69% inside the box
League avg 69%
From 181 of 263 shots over 21 matches
67% allowed inside the box
League avg 69%
From 195 of 291 shots allowed over 21 matches
76% open play · 24% set pieces
League avg 24% set pieces
From 6.6 of 27.3 npxG over 21 matches
75% open play · 25% set pieces
League avg 24% set pieces
From 6.4 of 25.8 npxG allowed over 21 matches
Lillestrøm SK home and away xG
| Measure | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 11 |
| xG / match | 1.62 | 1.50 |
| xGA / match | 1.30 | 1.60 |
| xGD / match | +0.32 | -0.10 |
| xPts / match Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works → | 1.63 | 1.32 |
Every figure divides by that half's matches with xG. A half with fewer than 3 matches with xG is muted.
Every Lillestrøm SK match by xG
Last 10
- Matches
- 10
- xG / match
- 1.55
- xGA / match
- 1.77
- xGD / match
- -0.21
- Points
- 13 of 30
- Sun 20/09 Viking FK A xG 1.77 xGA 2.98 P xGD -1.21 xPts 0.68
- Sat 12/09 Vålerenga IF H xG 0.70 xGA 1.57 xGD -0.87 xPts 0.65
- Sat 05/09 SK Brann A xG 1.33 xGA 1.97 xGD -0.64 xPts 0.91
- Sun 30/08 Fredrikstad FK H xG 2.34 P xGA 3.11 P xGD -0.77 xPts 0.95
- Sat 15/08 KFUM Oslo A Best underlying xG 2.80 P xGA 0.92 xGD +1.88 xPts 2.55
- Sun 09/08 Rosenborg BK H xG 2.39 xGA 2.45 xGD -0.06 xPts 1.35
- Fri 31/07 Bodø/Glimt A Weakest underlying xG 0.38 xGA 2.15 P xGD -1.77 xPts 0.23
- Wed 22/07 Viking FK H xG 1.35 P xGA 0.87 xGD +0.48 xPts 1.77
- Sat 18/07 KFUM Oslo H xG 1.24 xGA 0.46 xGD +0.78 xPts 2.07
- Sat 11/07 Fredrikstad FK A xG 1.24 xGA 1.17 xGD +0.07 xPts 1.41
Newest first. The dot is xG and the ring is xGA, on one scale from 0 to 3.11. Best and weakest underlying mark the highest and lowest xGD once 5 matches have xG. Against the chances marks a win with xGD of −1.00 or lower, or a loss with +1.00 or higher. P marks a side with at least 0.50 xG from penalties.
Lillestrøm SK in Eliteserien
Attack
- xG / match #7 of 16
- Shots / match #12 of 16
- Chance quality #5 of 16
- Home xG #11 of 16
- Away xG #4 of 16
Defence
- xGA / match #7 of 16
- Shots allowed #7 of 16
- Chance quality allowed #3 of 16
About the data
- xG data
- Provided by TheStatsAPI, and stored as published.
- Derived metrics
- xGD, per-match rates, rankings and rolling averages are calculated from the match data.
- Model metrics
- xPts is produced by our probability model.