xgEdge

Expected goals

Feyenoord expected goals (xG) 2026/2027

Eredivisie · after 7 matches · updated 1 Oct

Feyenoord's attacking and defensive expected goals in Eredivisie 2026/2027, compared with the results they produced and with the rest of the competition.

Feyenoord xG and xGA per match

Every match ↓
Attack
2.76 xG per match
#2/18
Attack (xG per match) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club xG per match
#1 PSV Eindhoven 2.87
#2 Feyenoord 2.76
#3 AFC Ajax 2.65
#4 AZ Alkmaar 2.55
#5 FC Twente 2.28
#6 Go Ahead Eagles 1.91
#7 Sparta Rotterdam 1.64
#8 NEC Nijmegen 1.60
#9 FC Groningen 1.54
#10 FC Utrecht 1.41
#11 SC Cambuur 1.35
#12 Excelsior 1.35
#13 Willem II Tilburg 1.29
#14 SC Heerenveen 1.26
#15 SC Telstar 1.09
#16 Fortuna Sittard 0.97
#17 PEC Zwolle 0.94
#18 ADO Den Haag 0.90
League avg
1.69
Total
19.32 7 matches
Defence
0.80 xGA per match
#2/18
Defence (xGA per match) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club xGA per match
#1 FC Twente 0.75
#2 Feyenoord 0.80
#3 AZ Alkmaar 0.95
#4 AFC Ajax 1.25
#5 SC Heerenveen 1.36
#6 PSV Eindhoven 1.37
#7 Excelsior 1.44
#8 Go Ahead Eagles 1.63
#9 ADO Den Haag 1.90
#10 NEC Nijmegen 1.92
#11 FC Groningen 1.93
#12 SC Cambuur 2.04
#13 SC Telstar 2.05
#14 PEC Zwolle 2.06
#15 Sparta Rotterdam 2.10
#16 FC Utrecht 2.11
#17 Willem II Tilburg 2.28
#18 Fortuna Sittard 2.42
League avg
1.69
Total
5.60 7 matches
xG difference
+1.96 xGD per match
#1/18
xG difference (xGD per match) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club xGD per match
#1 Feyenoord +1.96
#2 AZ Alkmaar +1.60
#3 FC Twente +1.53
#4 PSV Eindhoven +1.51
#5 AFC Ajax +1.40
#6 Go Ahead Eagles +0.28
#7 Excelsior -0.09
#8 SC Heerenveen -0.10
#9 NEC Nijmegen -0.32
#10 FC Groningen -0.39
#11 Sparta Rotterdam -0.46
#12 SC Cambuur -0.68
#13 FC Utrecht -0.70
#14 SC Telstar -0.96
#15 Willem II Tilburg -0.99
#16 ADO Den Haag -1.00
#17 PEC Zwolle -1.12
#18 Fortuna Sittard -1.46
League avg
0.00
Total
+13.72 7 matches
Expected points Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works →
2.49 xPts per match
#1/18
Expected points (xPts per match) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club xPts per match
#1 Feyenoord 2.49
#2 FC Twente 2.43
#3 AZ Alkmaar 2.30
#4 AFC Ajax 2.20
#5 PSV Eindhoven 2.18
#6 Go Ahead Eagles 1.59
#7 Excelsior 1.31
#8 FC Groningen 1.28
#9 SC Heerenveen 1.28
#10 NEC Nijmegen 1.18
#11 Sparta Rotterdam 1.15
#12 FC Utrecht 1.14
#13 SC Cambuur 0.91
#14 ADO Den Haag 0.85
#15 SC Telstar 0.79
#16 Willem II Tilburg 0.79
#17 PEC Zwolle 0.73
#18 Fortuna Sittard 0.72
League avg
1.41
Total
17.41 vs 17 actual pts

Early-season figures: after 7 matches, per-match rates can move quickly.

What the xG says

Feyenoord's underlying numbers are league-leading. They rank #1 for xG difference at +1.96 per match, driven by elite shot volume at about average chance quality. Their 25 goals are 5.68 above 19.32 xG, while 17 points are 0.41 below 17.41 xPts. After only 7 matches, those gaps should still be read cautiously.

Actual vs expected

Measure Actual Expected Difference Reading
Goals vs xG Includes 1.11 xG from penalties
25 19.32 +5.68 scored 5.68 more than xG outside normal variance
7 5.60 +1.40 conceded 1.40 more than xGA within normal variance

Select a row to chart it across the season.

Goals minus xG, match by match

Feyenoord are 5.68 goals above their xG after 7 matches.

Goals
25
xG
19.32
Gap
+5.68
Sun 09/08 Sun 16/08 Sun 23/08 Sun 30/08 Sat 05/09 Sun 13/09 Sun 20/09 -4 -2 0 +2 +4 +6 -2.53 -3.36 -0.93 -1.40 +0.49 +4.09 +5.68 -2.53 -0.83 +2.43 -0.47 +1.89 +3.60 +1.59 Running gap goals − xG Each match goals − xG
Feyenoord: Goals vs xG, the gap after every match with xG
Date Opponent Goals xG Match gap Running gap
Sun 09/08 Sparta Rotterdam 1 3.53 -2.53 -2.53
Sun 16/08 Go Ahead Eagles 2 2.83 -0.83 -3.36
Sun 23/08 SC Cambuur 5 2.57 +2.43 -0.93
Sun 30/08 ADO Den Haag 2 2.47 -0.47 -1.40
Sat 05/09 NEC Nijmegen 3 1.11 +1.89 +0.49
Sun 13/09 PEC Zwolle 7 3.40 +3.60 +4.09
Sun 20/09 FC Utrecht 5 3.41 +1.59 +5.68

Goals vs xG ranking → Expected points ranking →

Feyenoord xG trend

Current form +1.72 npxGD per match

The last 6 matches with xG.

Out-created the opponent in 7 of 7 matches.

npxG · last 6
2.45
npxGA · last 6
0.72
-1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +2.52 Sun 09/08 +1.38 Sun 16/08 +0.99 Sun 23/08 +2.23 Sun 30/08 +0.37 Sat 05/09 +3.33 Sun 13/09 +2.04 Sun 20/09 +1.84 season avg
Feyenoord: non-penalty xG, xGA and their difference in each match, with the season's average so far
Date Opponent npxG npxGA npxGD Avg so far
Sun 09/08 Sparta Rotterdam 3.53 1.01 +2.52 +2.52
Sun 16/08 Go Ahead Eagles 2.89 1.51 +1.38 +1.95
Sun 23/08 SC Cambuur 2.06 1.07 +0.99 +1.63
Sun 30/08 ADO Den Haag 2.47 0.24 +2.23 +1.78
Sat 05/09 NEC Nijmegen 1.11 0.74 +0.37 +1.50
Sun 13/09 PEC Zwolle 3.52 0.19 +3.33 +1.80
Sun 20/09 FC Utrecht 2.63 0.59 +2.04 +1.84

Each bar is one match's non-penalty xG minus the non-penalty xG against; the line is that difference averaged over the season up to each match, and it finishes on the dashed season average — 2.60 npxG and 0.76 npxGA per match. Current form is the same difference over the last 6 matches with xG.

Form ranking →

Strength of schedule

Season so far
number 16 hardest of 18 in Eredivisie
−0.21 xG vs league average
Over 7 league matches
Last 5
tied number 15 hardest of 18 in Eredivisie
−0.21 xG vs league average
Over 5 league matches
Opponents behind the figures

Season so far

−0.21 xG vs league average · over 7 matches · number 16 hardest of 18

  1. FC Utrecht Home −0.04
  2. PEC Zwolle Away −0.54
  3. NEC Nijmegen Away +0.13
  4. ADO Den Haag Home −0.29
  5. SC Cambuur Away −0.29
  6. Go Ahead Eagles Home −0.13
  7. Sparta Rotterdam Away −0.34

Last 5

−0.21 xG vs league average · over 5 matches · tied number 15 hardest of 18

  1. FC Utrecht Home −0.04
  2. PEC Zwolle Away −0.54
  3. NEC Nijmegen Away +0.13
  4. ADO Den Haag Home −0.29
  5. SC Cambuur Away −0.29

League schedule strength → How this is calculated →

Feyenoord shots and chance quality

High volume, average quality. Feyenoord take 22.3 shots a match (league 15.0) at 0.12 npxG a shot (league 0.11), #2 in Eredivisie for volume and #7 for quality. 70% of their shots come from inside the box (league 66%), and set pieces produce 19% of their npxG (league 18%).

Attack

Shot volume
22.3 shots per match
#2/18
Shot volume (shots per match) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club shots per match
#1 AFC Ajax 24.7
#2 Feyenoord 22.3
#3 FC Twente 21.6
#4 PSV Eindhoven 21.0
#5 AZ Alkmaar 19.4
#6 SC Heerenveen 16.0
=7 Go Ahead Eagles 15.1
=7 NEC Nijmegen 15.1
#9 FC Groningen 15.0
#10 Sparta Rotterdam 13.1
=11 ADO Den Haag 11.9
=11 SC Cambuur 11.9
=11 Willem II Tilburg 11.9
#14 Excelsior 11.3
#15 FC Utrecht 10.9
#16 PEC Zwolle 10.6
#17 Fortuna Sittard 10.1
#18 SC Telstar 7.9
League avg
15.0
Total
156 shots from 7 matches
Chance quality
0.12 npxG per shot
#7/18
Chance quality (npxG per shot) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club npxG per shot
#1 AZ Alkmaar 0.13
#2 Go Ahead Eagles 0.13
#3 PSV Eindhoven 0.13
#4 Sparta Rotterdam 0.12
#5 Excelsior 0.12
#6 FC Utrecht 0.12
#7 Feyenoord 0.12
#8 SC Cambuur 0.11
#9 Willem II Tilburg 0.11
#10 AFC Ajax 0.11
#11 SC Telstar 0.10
#12 NEC Nijmegen 0.10
#13 FC Groningen 0.10
#14 FC Twente 0.09
#15 Fortuna Sittard 0.09
#16 PEC Zwolle 0.09
#17 SC Heerenveen 0.08
#18 ADO Den Haag 0.08
League avg
0.11
Total
18.21 npxG from 156 shots

Defence

Shots allowed
9.6 shots per match
=2/18
Shots allowed (shots per match) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club shots per match
#1 AZ Alkmaar 8.1
=2 AFC Ajax 9.6
=2 Feyenoord 9.6
#4 FC Twente 10.0
#5 PSV Eindhoven 10.1
#6 NEC Nijmegen 11.6
#7 FC Groningen 15.1
=8 SC Cambuur 15.9
=8 SC Heerenveen 15.9
=10 ADO Den Haag 16.1
=10 Excelsior 16.1
#12 Go Ahead Eagles 16.6
#13 SC Telstar 17.9
#14 Sparta Rotterdam 18.0
#15 FC Utrecht 18.6
#16 Willem II Tilburg 19.9
#17 Fortuna Sittard 20.3
#18 PEC Zwolle 20.4
League avg
15.0
Total
67 shots allowed from 7 matches
Chance quality allowed
0.08 npxGA per shot
#2/18
Chance quality allowed (npxGA per shot) across Eredivisie, best first
Rank Club npxGA per shot
#1 FC Twente 0.06
#2 Feyenoord 0.08
#3 Excelsior 0.09
#4 SC Heerenveen 0.09
#5 Go Ahead Eagles 0.09
#6 PEC Zwolle 0.10
#7 FC Utrecht 0.10
#8 SC Telstar 0.11
#9 ADO Den Haag 0.11
#10 SC Cambuur 0.11
#11 Willem II Tilburg 0.11
#12 Fortuna Sittard 0.12
#13 Sparta Rotterdam 0.12
#14 AZ Alkmaar 0.12
#15 FC Groningen 0.12
#16 AFC Ajax 0.13
#17 PSV Eindhoven 0.13
#18 NEC Nijmegen 0.17
League avg
0.11
Total
5.35 npxGA from 67 shots

Shot profile

Shot location

70% inside the box

League avg 66%

From 109 of 156 shots over 7 matches

Early-season figure: after 7 matches, the share can move quickly.

Shots allowed, location

55% allowed inside the box

League avg 66%

From 37 of 67 shots allowed over 7 matches

Early-season figure: after 7 matches, the share can move quickly.

Where the npxG comes from

81% open play · 19% set pieces

League avg 18% set pieces

From 3.4 of 17.9 npxG over 7 matches

Early-season figure: after 7 matches, the share can move quickly.

Where the npxG allowed comes from

79% open play · 21% set pieces

League avg 18% set pieces

From 1.2 of 5.4 npxG allowed over 7 matches

Early-season figure: after 7 matches, the share can move quickly.

Feyenoord home and away xG

Feyenoord per-match figures at home and away
Measure Home Away
Matches 3 4
xG / match 2.90 2.65
xGA / match 0.86 0.75
xGD / match +2.04 +1.90
xPts / match Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works → 2.56 2.43

Every figure divides by that half's matches with xG. A half with fewer than 3 matches with xG is muted.

Every Feyenoord match by xG

Window
Season Last 10 Last 5
Venue

Newest first. The dot is xG and the ring is xGA, on one scale from 0 to 3.53. Best and weakest underlying mark the highest and lowest xGD once 5 matches have xG. Against the chances marks a win with xGD of −1.00 or lower, or a loss with +1.00 or higher. P marks a side with at least 0.50 xG from penalties.

Every result, all competitions →

Feyenoord in Eredivisie

Attack

Defence

About the data

xG data
Provided by TheStatsAPI, and stored as published.
Derived metrics
xGD, per-match rates, rankings and rolling averages are calculated from the match data.
Model metrics
xPts is produced by our probability model.

Learn how our xG analytics work →

How the model works →