xgEdge

Expected goals

Çaykur Rizespor expected goals (xG) 2026/2027

Süper Lig · after 6 matches · updated 1 Oct

Çaykur Rizespor's attacking and defensive expected goals in Süper Lig 2026/2027, compared with the results they produced and with the rest of the competition.

Çaykur Rizespor xG and xGA per match

Every match ↓
Attack
1.43 xG per match
#8/18
Attack (xG per match) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club xG per match
#1 Galatasaray 2.36
#2 Fenerbahçe 2.32
#3 Göztepe 1.99
#4 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 1.95
#5 Beşiktaş 1.85
#6 Trabzonspor 1.71
#7 Başakşehir FK 1.63
#8 Çaykur Rizespor 1.43
#9 Çorum FK 1.30
#10 Alanyaspor 1.24
#11 Konyaspor 1.24
#12 Samsunspor 1.15
#13 Kasımpaşa 1.14
#14 Gaziantep FK 1.11
#15 Kocaelispor 1.04
#16 Gençlerbirliği 1.01
#17 Eyüpspor 0.82
#18 Erzurumspor FK 0.67
League avg
1.44
Total
8.57 6 matches
Defence
1.31 xGA per match
#8/18
Defence (xGA per match) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club xGA per match
#1 Beşiktaş 0.66
#2 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 0.99
#3 Kasımpaşa 1.04
#4 Galatasaray 1.12
#5 Fenerbahçe 1.13
#6 Konyaspor 1.22
#7 Alanyaspor 1.28
#8 Çaykur Rizespor 1.31
#9 Kocaelispor 1.41
#10 Gaziantep FK 1.47
#11 Samsunspor 1.53
=12 Trabzonspor 1.56
=12 Çorum FK 1.56
#14 Erzurumspor FK 1.59
#15 Başakşehir FK 1.88
#16 Göztepe 1.92
#17 Eyüpspor 2.15
#18 Gençlerbirliği 2.16
League avg
1.44
Total
7.88 6 matches
xG difference
+0.11 xGD per match
#6/18
xG difference (xGD per match) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club xGD per match
#1 Galatasaray +1.24
#2 Beşiktaş +1.19
#3 Fenerbahçe +1.19
#4 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler +0.96
#5 Trabzonspor +0.16
#6 Çaykur Rizespor +0.11
#7 Kasımpaşa +0.10
#8 Göztepe +0.07
#9 Konyaspor +0.02
#10 Alanyaspor -0.04
#11 Başakşehir FK -0.25
#12 Çorum FK -0.25
#13 Gaziantep FK -0.36
#14 Kocaelispor -0.37
#15 Samsunspor -0.37
#16 Erzurumspor FK -0.92
#17 Gençlerbirliği -1.15
#18 Eyüpspor -1.32
League avg
0.00
Total
+0.69 6 matches
Expected points Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works →
1.54 xPts per match
#5/18
Expected points (xPts per match) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club xPts per match
#1 Beşiktaş 2.23
#2 Galatasaray 2.12
#3 Fenerbahçe 1.97
#4 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 1.84
#5 Çaykur Rizespor 1.54
#6 Göztepe 1.47
#7 Trabzonspor 1.45
#8 Başakşehir FK 1.40
#9 Kasımpaşa 1.39
#10 Konyaspor 1.38
#11 Çorum FK 1.36
#12 Alanyaspor 1.29
#13 Kocaelispor 1.13
#14 Gaziantep FK 1.11
#15 Samsunspor 1.02
#16 Erzurumspor FK 0.82
#17 Gençlerbirliği 0.72
#18 Eyüpspor 0.71
League avg
1.39
Total
9.24 vs 10 actual pts

Early-season figures: after 6 matches, per-match rates can move quickly.

What the xG says

Çaykur Rizespor's underlying numbers are among the best in Süper Lig. They rank #6 for xG difference at +0.11 per match, built on high shot volume rather than low chance quality. Their 7 goals are 1.57 below 8.57 xG, while 10 points are 0.76 above 9.24 xPts. After only 6 matches, those gaps should still be read cautiously.

Actual vs expected

Measure Actual Expected Difference Reading
Goals vs xG Includes 1.37 xG from penalties
7 8.57 -1.57 scored 1.57 fewer than xG within normal variance
6 7.88 -1.88 conceded 1.88 fewer than xGA within normal variance

Select a row to chart it across the season.

Goals minus xG, match by match

Çaykur Rizespor are 1.57 goals below their xG after 6 matches. The gap was widest at -2.87, against Eyüpspor on Sat 12/09.

Goals
7
xG
8.57
Gap
-1.57
Sat 15/08 Sat 22/08 Sat 29/08 Mon 07/09 Sat 12/09 Sun 20/09 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 -0.52 -2.37 -1.54 -2.82 -2.87 -1.57 -0.52 -1.85 +0.83 -1.28 -0.05 +1.30 Running gap goals − xG Each match goals − xG
Çaykur Rizespor: Goals vs xG, the gap after every match with xG
Date Opponent Goals xG Match gap Running gap
Sat 15/08 Konyaspor 1 1.52 -0.52 -0.52
Sat 22/08 Samsunspor 0 1.85 -1.85 -2.37
Sat 29/08 Gaziantep FK 2 1.17 +0.83 -1.54
Mon 07/09 Alanyaspor 0 1.28 -1.28 -2.82
Sat 12/09 Eyüpspor 2 2.05 -0.05 -2.87
Sun 20/09 Göztepe 2 0.70 +1.30 -1.57

Goals vs xG ranking → Expected points ranking →

Çaykur Rizespor xG trend

Current form +0.01 npxGD per match

The last 6 matches with xG.

Out-created the opponent in 4 of 6 matches. The worst was against Göztepe on Sun 20/09 (-1.18).

npxG · last 6
1.20
npxGA · last 6
1.19
-2 -1 0 +1 +2 +0.22 Sat 15/08 +1.43 Sat 22/08 +0.03 Sat 29/08 -0.86 Mon 07/09 +0.41 Sat 12/09 -1.18 Sun 20/09 +0.01 season avg
Çaykur Rizespor: non-penalty xG, xGA and their difference in each match, with the season's average so far
Date Opponent npxG npxGA npxGD Avg so far
Sat 15/08 Konyaspor 0.71 0.49 +0.22 +0.22
Sat 22/08 Samsunspor 1.71 0.28 +1.43 +0.83
Sat 29/08 Gaziantep FK 0.93 0.90 +0.03 +0.56
Mon 07/09 Alanyaspor 1.29 2.15 -0.86 +0.21
Sat 12/09 Eyüpspor 1.85 1.44 +0.41 +0.25
Sun 20/09 Göztepe 0.71 1.89 -1.18 +0.01

Each bar is one match's non-penalty xG minus the non-penalty xG against; the line is that difference averaged over the season up to each match, and it finishes on the dashed season average — 1.20 npxG and 1.19 npxGA per match. Current form is the same difference over the last 6 matches with xG.

Form ranking →

Strength of schedule

Season so far
number 18 hardest of 18 in Süper Lig
−0.15 xG vs league average
Over 6 league matches
Last 5
number 18 hardest of 18 in Süper Lig
−0.17 xG vs league average
Over 5 league matches
Opponents behind the figures

Season so far

−0.15 xG vs league average · over 6 matches · number 18 hardest of 18

  1. Göztepe Away +0.07
  2. Eyüpspor Away −0.42
  3. Alanyaspor Home −0.10
  4. Gaziantep FK Away −0.18
  5. Samsunspor Home −0.22
  6. Konyaspor Away −0.08

Last 5

−0.17 xG vs league average · over 5 matches · number 18 hardest of 18

  1. Göztepe Away +0.07
  2. Eyüpspor Away −0.42
  3. Alanyaspor Home −0.10
  4. Gaziantep FK Away −0.18
  5. Samsunspor Home −0.22

League schedule strength → How this is calculated →

Çaykur Rizespor shots and chance quality

High volume, low quality. Çaykur Rizespor take 15.5 shots a match (league 14.1) at 0.08 npxG a shot (league 0.09), #5 in Süper Lig for volume and #13 for quality. 51% of their shots come from inside the box (league 62%), and set pieces produce 19% of their npxG (league 25%).

Attack

Shot volume
15.5 shots per match
#5/18
Shot volume (shots per match) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club shots per match
#1 Galatasaray 22.7
#2 Fenerbahçe 18.3
#3 Beşiktaş 17.8
#4 Göztepe 17.2
#5 Çaykur Rizespor 15.5
#6 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 14.7
#7 Trabzonspor 14.2
#8 Samsunspor 13.2
=9 Başakşehir FK 13.0
=9 Eyüpspor 13.0
=9 Gaziantep FK 13.0
=9 Çorum FK 13.0
#13 Kocaelispor 12.3
#14 Gençlerbirliği 12.0
#15 Kasımpaşa 11.8
#16 Konyaspor 11.7
#17 Alanyaspor 10.8
#18 Erzurumspor FK 9.0
League avg
14.1
Total
93 shots from 6 matches
Chance quality
0.08 npxG per shot
#13/18
Chance quality (npxG per shot) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club npxG per shot
#1 Fenerbahçe 0.12
#2 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 0.12
#3 Alanyaspor 0.11
#4 Trabzonspor 0.11
#5 Konyaspor 0.10
#6 Galatasaray 0.10
#7 Başakşehir FK 0.09
#8 Beşiktaş 0.09
#9 Çorum FK 0.08
#10 Gençlerbirliği 0.08
#11 Kasımpaşa 0.08
#12 Erzurumspor FK 0.08
#13 Çaykur Rizespor 0.08
#14 Göztepe 0.08
#15 Kocaelispor 0.08
#16 Gaziantep FK 0.07
#17 Samsunspor 0.06
#18 Eyüpspor 0.06
League avg
0.09
Total
7.20 npxG from 93 shots

Defence

Shots allowed
14.8 shots per match
#12/18
Shots allowed (shots per match) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club shots per match
#1 Beşiktaş 8.5
#2 Galatasaray 10.0
#3 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 11.0
#4 Fenerbahçe 12.5
#5 Trabzonspor 12.7
=6 Başakşehir FK 13.5
=6 Kasımpaşa 13.5
#8 Erzurumspor FK 13.7
#9 Alanyaspor 14.2
#10 Gaziantep FK 14.3
#11 Eyüpspor 14.5
#12 Çaykur Rizespor 14.8
#13 Konyaspor 15.0
#14 Samsunspor 15.3
#15 Çorum FK 16.2
#16 Kocaelispor 17.2
=17 Gençlerbirliği 18.2
=17 Göztepe 18.2
League avg
14.1
Total
89 shots allowed from 6 matches
Chance quality allowed
0.08 npxGA per shot
#8/18
Chance quality allowed (npxGA per shot) across Süper Lig, best first
Rank Club npxGA per shot
#1 Konyaspor 0.07
#2 Beşiktaş 0.07
#3 Kasımpaşa 0.07
#4 Gaziantep FK 0.08
#5 Alanyaspor 0.08
#6 Amed Sportif Faaliyetler 0.08
#7 Göztepe 0.08
#8 Çaykur Rizespor 0.08
#9 Kocaelispor 0.08
#10 Çorum FK 0.08
#11 Fenerbahçe 0.09
#12 Trabzonspor 0.09
#13 Samsunspor 0.09
#14 Galatasaray 0.10
#15 Gençlerbirliği 0.10
#16 Erzurumspor FK 0.11
#17 Eyüpspor 0.12
#18 Başakşehir FK 0.13
League avg
0.09
Total
7.15 npxGA from 89 shots

Shot profile

Shot location

51% inside the box

League avg 62%

From 47 of 93 shots over 6 matches

Early-season figure: after 6 matches, the share can move quickly.

Shots allowed, location

63% allowed inside the box

League avg 62%

From 56 of 89 shots allowed over 6 matches

Early-season figure: after 6 matches, the share can move quickly.

Where the npxG comes from

81% open play · 19% set pieces

League avg 25% set pieces

From 1.4 of 7.3 npxG over 6 matches

Early-season figure: after 6 matches, the share can move quickly.

Where the npxG allowed comes from

69% open play · 31% set pieces

League avg 25% set pieces

From 2.2 of 7.1 npxG allowed over 6 matches

Early-season figure: after 6 matches, the share can move quickly.

Çaykur Rizespor home and away xG

Çaykur Rizespor per-match figures at home and away
Measure Home only 2 matches with xG Away
Matches 2 4
xG / match 1.57 1.36
xGA / match 1.20 1.37
xGD / match +0.37 -0.01
xPts / match Model — Model output — computed from each match's xG, not a result. How xPts works → 1.68 1.47

Every figure divides by that half's matches with xG. A half with fewer than 3 matches with xG is muted.

Every Çaykur Rizespor match by xG

Window
Season Last 10 Last 5
Venue

Newest first. The dot is xG and the ring is xGA, on one scale from 0 to 3.00. Best and weakest underlying mark the highest and lowest xGD once 5 matches have xG. Against the chances marks a win with xGD of −1.00 or lower, or a loss with +1.00 or higher. P marks a side with at least 0.50 xG from penalties.

Every result, all competitions →

Çaykur Rizespor in Süper Lig

Attack

Defence

About the data

xG data
Provided by TheStatsAPI, and stored as published.
Derived metrics
xGD, per-match rates, rankings and rolling averages are calculated from the match data.
Model metrics
xPts is produced by our probability model.

Learn how our xG analytics work →

How the model works →